These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35317856)

  • 1. Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Luo C; Wu G; Huang X; Zhang Y; Ma Y; Huang Y; Huang Z; Li H; Hou Y; Chen J; Li X; Xu S
    Stem Cell Res Ther; 2022 Mar; 13(1):123. PubMed ID: 35317856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of preclinical studies.
    Luo C; Wang L; Wu G; Huang X; Zhang Y; Ma Y; Xie M; Sun Y; Huang Y; Huang Z; Song Q; Li H; Hou Y; Li X; Xu S; Chen J
    Stem Cell Res Ther; 2021 May; 12(1):310. PubMed ID: 34051862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additional plerixafor to granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation for autologous transplantation in people with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
    Hartmann T; Hübel K; Monsef I; Engert A; Skoetz N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Oct; 2015(10):CD010615. PubMed ID: 26484982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plerixafor: A chemokine receptor-4 antagonist for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
    Steinberg M; Silva M
    Clin Ther; 2010 May; 32(5):821-43. PubMed ID: 20685493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis.
    Laszlo D; Marcacci GP; Martino M; Radice D; Rabascio C; Lucchetti B; Magarò A; Caime A; Menna S; Lionetti MT; Bertolini F
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102819. PubMed ID: 32499108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Plerixafor: a review of its use in stem-cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
    Keating GM
    Drugs; 2011 Aug; 71(12):1623-47. PubMed ID: 21861545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. G-CSF + plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilized hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Y; Qiu X; Lei Y; Zhou R
    Ann Med; 2024 Dec; 56(1):2329140. PubMed ID: 38470973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.
    Awan F; Kochuparambil ST; Falconer DE; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Deremer D; Jillella A; Craig M; Hamadani M
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Oct; 48(10):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23584435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.
    Chaudhary L; Awan F; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Tse W; Craig M; Hamadani M
    J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 23765597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.
    Nademanee AP; DiPersio JF; Maziarz RT; Stadtmauer EA; Micallef IN; Stiff PJ; Hsu FJ; Bridger G; Bolwell BJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Oct; 18(10):1564-72. PubMed ID: 22683613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plerixafor: a peripheral blood stem cell mobilizer.
    Kessans MR; Gatesman ML; Kockler DR
    Pharmacotherapy; 2010 May; 30(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 20411999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plerixafor injection: a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizer in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma.
    Jantunen E; Varmavuo V; Valtola J
    Expert Rev Hematol; 2016 Aug; 9(8):723-32. PubMed ID: 27355397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation.
    Pusic I; Jiang SY; Landua S; Uy GL; Rettig MP; Cashen AF; Westervelt P; Vij R; Abboud CN; Stockerl-Goldstein KE; Sempek DS; Smith AL; DiPersio JF
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2008 Sep; 14(9):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 18721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
    Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
    Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful stem cell remobilization using plerixafor (mozobil) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with non-hodgkin lymphoma: results from the plerixafor NHL phase 3 study rescue protocol.
    Micallef IN; Stiff PJ; DiPersio JF; Maziarz RT; McCarty JM; Bridger G; Calandra G
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2009 Dec; 15(12):1578-86. PubMed ID: 19896082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased efficacy of intermediate-dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to DHAP + G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma: an analysis by the polish lymphoma research group.
    Giebel S; Sadus-Wojciechowska M; Halaburda K; Drozd-Sokolowska J; Wierzbowska A; Najda J; Mendrek W; Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka M; Nowicki M; Holowiecki J; Czerw T
    Ann Hematol; 2016 Jan; 95(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 26611854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of Plerixafor or Cyclophosphamide Combined with G-CSF in Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Multiple Myeloma].
    Li WT; Ma LM; Lian Y; Wang QG; Gao ZJ; Zhao S
    Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 31(5):1403-1409. PubMed ID: 37846691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of plerixafor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization for autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang X; Wan M; Yu F; Wang Z
    Exp Ther Med; 2019 Aug; 18(2):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 31363366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Successful hematopoietic stem cell collection in patients who fail initial plerixafor mobilization for autologous stem cell transplant.
    Veeraputhiran M; Jain T; Cronin S; Al-Kadhimi Z; Abidi MH; Ayash L; Mellert K; Lum LG; Ratanatharathorn V; Uberti JP; Deol A
    J Clin Apher; 2014 Dec; 29(6):293-8. PubMed ID: 24700728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
    J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.