356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35318308)
1. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
Gutheil TG
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are symptoms assessed differently for schizophrenia and other psychoses in legal insanity evaluations of violent crimes?
Løvgren PJ; Laake P; Narud K; Reitan SK; Bjørkly S
BMC Psychiatry; 2023 Jul; 23(1):487. PubMed ID: 37420230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity?
Gowensmith WN; Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT
Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 22775304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hendricks v. People: forcing the insanity defense on an unwilling defendant.
Miller RD
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 12108569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.
Reisner AD; Piel J; Makey M
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23503181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neuroscience-based Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility: Beyond Self-Report?
Meynen G
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jul; 29(3):446-458. PubMed ID: 32484135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structured instruments for insanity defense evaluations: Opportunities and limitations.
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Ferracuti S
Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(5):432-444. PubMed ID: 36938899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insanity defenses: contested or conceded?
Rogers JL; Bloom JD; Manson SM
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):885-8. PubMed ID: 6731639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison of four insanity defense standards.
Wettstein RM; Mulvey EP; Rogers R
Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jan; 148(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 1984702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insanity Defense: Past, Present, and Future.
Math SB; Kumar CN; Moirangthem S
Indian J Psychol Med; 2015; 37(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 26702167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal insanity: assessment of the inability to refrain.
Donohue A; Arya V; Fitch L; Hammen D
Psychiatry (Edgmont); 2008 Mar; 5(3):58-66. PubMed ID: 19727300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overlapping universe: understanding legal insanity and psychosis.
Torry ZD; Billick SB
Psychiatr Q; 2010 Sep; 81(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 20373024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Insanity defense typology.
Brown KP
Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 29676495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptions of insanity based on occupation of defendant and seriousness of crime.
McGraw SL; Foley LA
Psychol Rep; 2000 Feb; 86(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 10778266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule.
Goldstein RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 2790225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
