161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35318407)
21. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 1.5 T In Vivo.
Schröder D; Grupe G; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Ernst A; Seidl R; Mittmann P
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():9163285. PubMed ID: 30533442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performing MRI Scans on Cochlear Implant and Auditory Brainstem Implant Recipients: Review of 14.5 Years Experience.
Tam YC; Lee JWY; Gair J; Jackson C; Donnelly NP; Tysome JR; Axon PR; Bance ML
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jun; 41(5):e556-e562. PubMed ID: 31985706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The usefulness of the O-MAR algorithm in MRI skull base assessment to manage cochlear implant-related artifacts.
Canzi P; Carlotto E; Simoncelli A; Lafe E; Scribante A; Minervini D; Nardo M; Malpede S; Chiapparini L; Benazzo M
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2023 Aug; 43(4):273-282. PubMed ID: 37488991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Magnet dislocation following magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant users: Diagnostic pathways and managment.
Holtmann L; Hans S; Kaster F; Müller V; Lang S; Göricke S; Lang-Roth R; Arweiler-Harbeck D
Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Jul; 22(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 33576730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of cochlear implant electrode scalar position by 3 Tesla magnet resonance imaging.
Riemann C; Scholtz LU; Gehl HB; Schürmann M; Sudhoff H; Todt I
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):21298. PubMed ID: 34716377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Peculiarities of preparing a patient with a cochlear implant for a magnetic resonance imaging].
Mileshina NA; Kurbatova EV; Dobryakova MM; Sholokhova NA; Pasechnikov AV; Kessel AE
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2022; 87(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 36107177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reduction of motion, truncation and flow artifacts using BLADE sequences in cervical spine MR imaging.
Lavdas E; Mavroidis P; Kostopoulos S; Ninos C; Strikou AD; Glotsos D; Vlachopoulou A; Oikonomou G; Economopoulos N; Roka V; Sakkas GK; Tsagkalis A; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N; Batsikas G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Feb; 33(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 25461304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cochlear implants and 1.5 T MRI scans: the effect of diametrically bipolar magnets and screw fixation on pain.
Todt I; Rademacher G; Grupe G; Stratmann A; Ernst A; Mutze S; Mittmann P
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(1):11. PubMed ID: 29402322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cochlear implant magnet dislocation after MRI: surgical management and outcome.
Leinung M; Loth A; Gröger M; Burck I; Vogl T; Stöver T; Helbig S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 277(5):1297-1304. PubMed ID: 32008075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnetic resonance imaging in cadaver dogs with metallic vertebral implants at 3 Tesla: evaluation of the WARP-turbo spin echo sequence.
Griffin JF; Archambault NS; Mankin JM; Wall CR; Thompson JA; Padua A; Purdy D; Kerwin SC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):E1548-53. PubMed ID: 23921320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of MRI in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with and without retained magnet.
Walker B; Norton S; Phillips G; Christianson E; Horn D; Ou H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 109():44-49. PubMed ID: 29728183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.
Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 3.0 T high-resolution MR imaging of carpal ligaments and TFCC.
Lenk S; Ludescher B; Martirosan P; Schick F; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):664-7. PubMed ID: 15122464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients.
Kim BG; Kim JW; Park JJ; Kim SH; Kim HN; Choi JY
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Jan; 141(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 25411817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metal Artifact Reduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging Around Arthroplasty Implants: The Negative Effect of Long Echo Trains on the Implant-Related Artifact.
Kumar NM; de Cesar Netto C; Schon LC; Fritz J
Invest Radiol; 2017 May; 52(5):310-316. PubMed ID: 28079703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.
Wagner F; Wimmer W; Leidolt L; Vischer M; Weder S; Wiest R; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio MD
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132483. PubMed ID: 26200775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of head position on cochlear implant MRI artifact.
Ay N; Gehl HB; Sudhoff H; Todt I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 278(8):2763-2767. PubMed ID: 32909061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant.
Vincent C; Ruzza I; Vaneecloo FM; Dubrulle F
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 265(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 18297299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pain Free 3 T MRI Scans in Cochlear Implantees.
Todt I; Tittel A; Ernst A; Mittmann P; Mutze S
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e401-e404. PubMed ID: 28938274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cochlear implant user perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging.
Dewey RS; Kitterick PT
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Jan; 23(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 34315344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
