185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35319912)
1. Strategies for Reducing False-Positive Screening Results for Intermediate-Size Nodules Evaluated Using Lung-RADS: A Secondary Analysis of National Lung Screening Trial Data.
Hammer MM; Hunsaker AR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 35319912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lung-RADS Version 1.0 versus Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Comparison of Categories Using Nodules from the National Lung Screening Trial.
Kastner J; Hossain R; Jeudy J; Dako F; Mehta V; Dalal S; Dharaiya E; White C
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):199-206. PubMed ID: 33944631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer Risk in Nodules Detected at Follow-Up Lung Cancer Screening CT.
Hammer MM; Byrne SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Apr; 218(4):634-641. PubMed ID: 34755524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Malignant Nodules Detected on Lung Cancer Screening CT: Yield of Short-Term Follow-Up CT in Showing Nodule Growth.
Byrne SC; Hammer MM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 35674352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lung cancer screening by nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1: negative baseline CT yields potential for increased screening interval.
Silva M; Milanese G; Sestini S; Sabia F; Jacobs C; van Ginneken B; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Marchianò A; Sverzellati N; Pastorino U
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1956-1968. PubMed ID: 32997182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved Interobserver Agreement on Lung-RADS Classification of Solid Nodules Using Semiautomated CT Volumetry.
Gierada DS; Rydzak CE; Zei M; Rhea L
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):675-684. PubMed ID: 32930652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lung-RADS Category 3 and 4 Nodules on Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice.
Mendoza DP; Petranovic M; Som A; Wu MY; Park EY; Zhang EW; Archer JM; McDermott S; Khandekar M; Lanuti M; Gainor JF; Lennes IT; Shepard JO; Digumarthy SR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 35080453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 1.1 and Lung-RADS Version 2022 in Classifying Airway Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT.
DeSimone AK; Byrne SC; Hammer MM
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging; 2024 Feb; 6(1):e230149. PubMed ID: 38300115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer Risk in Subsolid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Hammer MM; Palazzo LL; Kong CY; Hunsaker AR
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31526256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate of benign nodule resection in a lung cancer screening program.
El Alam R; Byrne SC; Hammer MM
Clin Imaging; 2023 Dec; 104():109984. PubMed ID: 37832324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insights for Management of Ground-Glass Opacities From the National Lung Screening Trial.
Robbins HA; Katki HA; Cheung LC; Landy R; Berg CD
J Thorac Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(9):1662-1665. PubMed ID: 31125735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Malignancy risk estimation of screen-detected nodules at baseline CT: comparison of the PanCan model, Lung-RADS and NCCN guidelines.
van Riel SJ; Ciompi F; Jacobs C; Winkler Wille MM; Scholten ET; Naqibullah M; Lam S; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4019-4029. PubMed ID: 28293773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malignancy estimation of Lung-RADS criteria for subsolid nodules on CT: accuracy of low and high risk spectrum when using NLST nodules.
Chung K; Jacobs C; Scholten ET; Mets OM; Dekker I; Prokop M; van Ginneken B; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4672-4679. PubMed ID: 28439653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterizing Lung-RADS category 4 lesions in a university lung cancer screening program.
Kocher Wulfeck M; Plesner S; Herndon JE; Christensen JD; Patz EF
Lung Cancer; 2023 Dec; 186():107420. PubMed ID: 37956610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals.
Heuvelmans MA; Oudkerk M; de Bock GH; de Koning HJ; Xie X; van Ooijen PM; Greuter MJ; de Jong PA; Groen HJ; Vliegenthart R
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1836-45. PubMed ID: 23508275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment.
Pinsky PF; Gierada DS; Black W; Munden R; Nath H; Aberle D; Kazerooni E
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 162(7):485-91. PubMed ID: 25664444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of computer-aided diagnosis for Lung-RADS categorization in CT screening for lung cancer: effect on inter-reader agreement.
Park S; Park H; Lee SM; Ahn Y; Kim W; Jung K; Seo JB
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1054-1064. PubMed ID: 34331112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination.
Gierada DS; Pinsky P; Nath H; Chiles C; Duan F; Aberle DR
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Nov; 106(11):. PubMed ID: 25326638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of the PanCan Model and Lung-RADS to Assess Cancer Probability Among People With Screening-Detected, Solid Lung Nodules.
Sundaram V; Gould MK; Nair VS
Chest; 2021 Mar; 159(3):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 33393476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Malignant Pulmonary Nodules in Chest Radiographs.
Yoo H; Kim KH; Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Kalra MK
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Sep; 3(9):e2017135. PubMed ID: 32970157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
