These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35320113)

  • 41. Audiological benefit, quality of life, and factors associated with functional gain in elderly hearing aid users in a developing country between 2017 and 2020: a pre-post-study.
    Peñaranda D; Pérez-Herrera LC; Moreno-López S; Noguera L; Hernández D; Martínez D; Peñaranda A
    BMC Geriatr; 2023 Jun; 23(1):376. PubMed ID: 37337203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hearing aids are still beneficial to patients, even if they have a low speech discrimination.
    Kim H; Choo OS; Park K; Gu GY; Park SH; Jang JH; Park HY; Choung YH
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 277(11):2987-2994. PubMed ID: 32390083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [The Influence of Hearing Loss Represented by Standard Audiogram Types to Unaided APHAB Scores].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Kappe T; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Aug; 95(8):540-5. PubMed ID: 27064271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Audiological and subjective outcomes of 100 implanted transcutaneous bone conduction devices and preoperative bone conduction hearing aids in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia.
    Yang J; Chen P; Zhao C; Liu Y; Gao M; Huang Z; Zhao S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 140(8):675-681. PubMed ID: 32432498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
    Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. One-Year Follow-Up in Children with Conductive Hearing Loss Using ADHEAR.
    Zernotti ME; Alvarado E; Zernotti M; Claveria N; Di Gregorio MF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(6):435-444. PubMed ID: 33831862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
    Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effectiveness of an affordable hearing aid with elderly persons.
    McPherson B; Wong ET
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 27(11):601-9. PubMed ID: 16019870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Esteem® middle ear device versus conventional hearing aids for rehabilitation of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Monini S; Biagini M; Atturo F; Barbara M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 270(7):2027-33. PubMed ID: 23143506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA.
    Hickson L; Clutterbuck S; Khan A
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Aug; 49(8):586-95. PubMed ID: 20515423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [The evaluation of hearing aid effect in presbycusis].
    Lu HH; Chen Y; Wang W; Wang Y; Chen TS; Xu KX; Zhao H; Cheng Y; Ma YX; Lin P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 30(10):788-790. PubMed ID: 29798054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids.
    Wood SA; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Mar; 43(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 15198378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.