131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35320149)
1. Reliability of three different methods for assessing amputee residuum shape and volume: 3D scanners vs. circumferential measurements.
Seminati E; Young M; Canepa Talamas D; Twiste M; Dhokia V; Bilzon J
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Aug; 46(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 35320149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees' residual limb models.
Seminati E; Canepa Talamas D; Young M; Twiste M; Dhokia V; Bilzon JLJ
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184498. PubMed ID: 28886154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of the iSense optical scanner for measuring volume of transtibial residual limb models.
Armitage L; Kwah LK; Kark L
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 30343619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical usability, reliability, and repeatability of noncontact scanners in measuring residual limb volume in persons with transtibial amputation.
Kofman R; Winter RE; Emmelot CH; Geertzen JH; Dijkstra PU
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 34932511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Reliability of a Shape Capturing Process for Transradial Residual Limb Using a Non-Contact Scanner.
Ngan CC; Sivasambu H; Ramdial S; Andrysek J
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement properties and usability of non-contact scanners for measuring transtibial residual limb volume.
Kofman R; Beekman AM; Emmelot CH; Geertzen JHB; Dijkstra PU
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):280-287. PubMed ID: 29113533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of a modified passive socket system on short-term changes in residuum volume and comfort: A preliminary study in transtibial amputees.
Atallah H; Kenney L; Howard D; Liu A; Head J
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Feb; 46(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 34772866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of handheld structured light scanners and a static stereophotogrammetry system in facial three-dimensional surface imaging.
Schipper JAM; Merema BJ; Hollander MHJ; Spijkervet FKL; Dijkstra PU; Jansma J; Schepers RH; Kraeima J
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8172. PubMed ID: 38589391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Framework for Measuring the Time-Varying Shape and Full-Field Deformation of Residual Limbs Using 3-D Digital Image Correlation.
Solav D; Moerman KM; Jaeger AM; Herr HM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Oct; 66(10):2740-2752. PubMed ID: 30676943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a residuum/socket interface simulator for lower limb prosthetics.
McGrath MP; Gao J; Tang J; Laszczak P; Jiang L; Bader D; Moser D; Zahedi S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Mar; 231(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 28164748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterisation of dynamic couplings at lower limb residuum/socket interface using 3D motion capture.
Tang J; McGrath M; Laszczak P; Jiang L; Bader DL; Moser D; Zahedi S
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Dec; 37(12):1162-8. PubMed ID: 26525779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pressure and shear sensor system for stress measurement at lower limb residuum/socket interface.
Laszczak P; McGrath M; Tang J; Gao J; Jiang L; Bader DL; Moser D; Zahedi S
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Jul; 38(7):695-700. PubMed ID: 27118308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning.
Modabber A; Peters F; Kniha K; Goloborodko E; Ghassemi A; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Möhlhenrich SC
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1719-1724. PubMed ID: 27614543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and Measurement Error of Breast Volume Calculation Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging.
Fearn N; Meybodi F; Kilbreath S; Dylke E; Llanos C; Swanton C; Stuart K
Lymphat Res Biol; 2023 Jun; 21(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 36154463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Portable three-dimensional imaging to monitor small volume enhancement in face, vulva, and hand: A comparative study.
Almadori A; Speiser S; Ashby I; Lacher R; Bishop D; Mosahebi A; Butler PE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Sep; 75(9):3574-3585. PubMed ID: 35659734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of 3D printed mechanical metamaterials for prosthetic liners.
Devin KM; Tang J; Hamilton AR; Moser D; Jiang L
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Mar; 238(3):348-357. PubMed ID: 38279687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.
van der Esch M; Steultjens M; Ostelo RW; Harlaar J; Dekker J
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 16332948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing reliability between 3D imaging and 2D photography for external nasal anthropometry.
Seo YS; Jo KH; Kim JY; Kwon JH
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4531. PubMed ID: 35296785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional surface scanners compared with standard anthropometric measurements for head shape.
Beaumont CAA; Knoops PGM; Borghi A; Jeelani NUO; Koudstaal MJ; Schievano S; Dunaway DJ; Rodriguez-Florez N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):921-927. PubMed ID: 28454666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
