These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35320221)

  • 1. Correlation of lip profile preferences in Pakistani population; and its comparison with orthodontic norms.
    Mansoor HB; Khalid Z; Jan A; Zaheer R
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Mar; 72(3):440-443. PubMed ID: 35320221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Antero-Posterior Lip Position in Most Favored Facial Profile of Jaipur Population.
    Sharma K; Trehan M; Singh S; Mahlawat H; Kenkare P; Jayavarma S A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27774. PubMed ID: 36106287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging.
    Hier LA; Evans CA; BeGole EA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10371428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aesthetic Evaluation Of The Lower Third Of The Face Comparing Cephalometric And Photographic Analysis Considering Nasolabial And Labiomental Angles In Young Adult Pakistani Population.
    Ahmad N; Mirza KS; Ijaz F; Mushtaq R; Mushtaq Z; Khalid A; Abbas H
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(4):646-650. PubMed ID: 35124924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses.
    Bishara SE; Hession TJ; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 3862344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cephalometric lip morphology in a Saudi sub population: A cross sectional study.
    Alshahrani I; Kamran MA; Asiry MA; Alshahrani A; Almoammar S; Alhaizaey A
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Jan; 70(1):151-153. PubMed ID: 31954042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [In vitro study of a new lasso device for intra-canal broken instrument removal].
    Cai CL; Ye NS; Yuan LJ; Wu SC; Pan GY; Fang B
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Dec; 30(6):611-617. PubMed ID: 35587016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of vertical positions of anterior teeth on smile esthetics in Japanese and korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
    Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Aug; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 23910186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of orthodontic-induced facial morphology changes on aesthetic evaluation: a retrospective study.
    Liu C; Du S; Wang Z; Guo S; Cui M; Zhai Q; Zhang M; Fang B
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):24. PubMed ID: 38183059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ricketts' E-line profile preferences among Nigerian orthodontists, orthodontic trainees, and a young undergraduate students' population.
    Otuyemi O; Afolabi D; Oyewole T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):541-547. PubMed ID: 35439916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Experimental Study on Esthetic Preference and Satisfaction of Lip Position with Various Facial Divergences among the South Indian Population.
    Kumar AA; Mithun EK; Kumar S; Divakar G; Sekar S; Nagarajan S
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S156-S159. PubMed ID: 36110621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 24910646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cephalometric norms of esthetically pleasing faces.
    Shaikh AJ; Alvi AR
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Dec; 19(12):754-8. PubMed ID: 20042151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of using the entire face to assess facial profile attractiveness.
    Tauk A; Bassil-Nassif N; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal J
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 26867684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.