51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3532027)
1. [Experimental and clinical studies of non-ionic isoosmolality contrast medium (iohexol 140)--II. IADSA in clinical practice].
Tajima N
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Apr; 46(4):541-52. PubMed ID: 3532027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tolerance of iopromide in angiography: a multicenter study.
Langer M; Behrends B; Langer R; Eichstädt H; Jänicke UA
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():61-6. PubMed ID: 2568810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse reactions following two separate intravascular injections of contrast media in the same patient. A comparison between iohexol and monomeric ionic media.
Sogn EE; Odegård T; Haider T; Andrew E
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 2952151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with non-ionic iso-osmolality contrast medium].
Kumazaki T; Tajima N; Ohya T; Tajima H; Ariga N; Hosoi S; Honda K; Ebata K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Apr; 45(4):660-2. PubMed ID: 3898017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Contrast media in cardiology. Report of a randomized, double-blind multicenter comparative study of the side effects of ionic and non-ionic roentgen contrast media].
Hellige G; Vogel B; Tebbe U; Kreuzer H
Z Kardiol; 1992 May; 81(5):290-2. PubMed ID: 1621410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Iohexol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
Stiris MG; Laerum F
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(6):767-70. PubMed ID: 2962617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phase II studies in urography, cardioangiography and cerebral angiography with iohexol. An evaluation of the clinical trial program and the clinical findings.
Andrew E; Sveen K; Renaa T; Dahlstrøm K
Eur J Radiol; 1983 Aug; 3(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 6628397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fixed drug eruption associated with intravenous contrast media: report in a woman receiving iohexol.
Wright NA; Cohen PR
J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jul; 10(7):802-4. PubMed ID: 21720665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Experimental and clinical studies of non-ionic isoosmolality contrast medium (iohexol 140)--I. The effect of isoosmolality contrast media on red cell shape].
Tajima N
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Mar; 46(3):469-77. PubMed ID: 3748789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) of peripheral arteries with isotonic contrast materials].
Yashiro N; Itai Y; Iio M
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1985 Jul; 30(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 3903287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of various contrast media on platelet aggregation--an in vivo study].
Shinmoto H; Ido K; Yuasa Y; Endo M; Yasuoka H; Edamitsu S; Takahashi K; Koizumi J; Hiramatsu K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Feb; 49(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 2755782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Acute adverse effects and complications of central venous digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Results of 2,600 studies].
Gross-Fengels W; Beyer D; Fischbach R; Lanfermann H
Med Klin (Munich); 1991 Nov; 86(11):561-5. PubMed ID: 1770895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Complications of intravenous digital subtraction angiography--results in 500 patients].
Gross-Fengels W; Neufang KF; Beyer D; Steinbrich W
Rontgenblatter; 1987 Sep; 40(9):281-5. PubMed ID: 3310189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lumbar myelography with iohexol. Adverse effects compared with spinal puncture.
Nestvold K; Sortland O
Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(6):637-40. PubMed ID: 3190941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of iohexol and ioxaglate in selective coronary angiography.
Haagen FD; Lok D; Pasteuning H
Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():16A-20A. PubMed ID: 3435850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical studies of a new non-ionic contrast medium--iohexol (Omnipaque)--in patients sensitive to ionic contrast medium].
Fuse H; Miyazaki K; Nakasima T; Fujita Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Feb; 35(2):371-5. PubMed ID: 2735246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of 2 non-ionic radiographic contrast agents in intravenous subtraction angiography].
Kristensen J; Andresen JH
Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Jun; 151(23):1474-5. PubMed ID: 2660379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
