161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35320381)
61. Metal implants on CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction algorithms for reduction of metal artifacts with single energy and spectral CT scanning in a phantom model.
Fang J; Zhang D; Wilcox C; Heidinger B; Raptopoulos V; Brook A; Brook OR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Mar; 42(3):742-748. PubMed ID: 28044188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Combined application of virtual monoenergetic high keV images and the orthopedic metal artifact reduction algorithm (O-MAR): effect on image quality.
Park J; Kim SH; Han JK
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):756-765. PubMed ID: 30135970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Iterative metal artefact reduction in CT: can dedicated algorithms improve image quality after spinal instrumentation?
Aissa J; Thomas C; Sawicki LM; Caspers J; Kröpil P; Antoch G; Boos J
Clin Radiol; 2017 May; 72(5):428.e7-428.e12. PubMed ID: 28065638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Metal artifact reduction from reformatted projections for hip prostheses in multislice helical computed tomography: techniques and initial clinical results.
Yu L; Li H; Mueller J; Kofler JM; Liu X; Primak AN; Fletcher JG; Guimaraes LS; Macedo T; McCollough CH
Invest Radiol; 2009 Nov; 44(11):691-6. PubMed ID: 19809345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Iterative metal artifact reduction on a clinical photon counting system-technical possibilities and reconstruction selection for optimal results dependent on the metal scenario.
Anhaus JA; Schmidt S; Killermann P; Mahnken A; Hofmann C
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jun; 67(11):. PubMed ID: 35594851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Reliability and benefits of single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction (SEMAR) in the different orthopedic hardware for the hip.
Chen YH; Lu CH; Chen YJ; Chen HS; Hsieh TJ
Skeletal Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(9):1853-1863. PubMed ID: 35347404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Dual-layer spectral computerized tomography for metal artifact reduction: small versus large orthopedic devices.
Kosmas C; Hojjati M; Young PC; Abedi A; Gholamrezanezhad A; Rajiah P
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1981-1990. PubMed ID: 31154493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR) of the Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Agent Onyx in Computed Tomography : An Experimental Study.
Schmitt N; Weyland CS; Wucherpfennig L; Herweh C; Bendszus M; Möhlenbruch MA; Vollherbst DF
Clin Neuroradiol; 2022 Sep; 32(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 34643742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Total hip prosthesis metal-artifact suppression using iterative deblurring reconstruction.
Robertson DD; Yuan J; Wang G; Vannier MW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 9071303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Evaluation of dual energy CT and iterative metal artefact reduction (iMAR) for artefact reduction in radiation therapy.
Lim P; Barber J; Sykes J
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Dec; 42(4):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 31602593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Clinical evaluation of a commercial orthopedic metal artifact reduction tool for CT simulations in radiation therapy.
Li H; Noel C; Chen H; Harold Li H; Low D; Moore K; Klahr P; Michalski J; Gay HA; Thorstad W; Mutic S
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7507-17. PubMed ID: 23231300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Metal Artifact Reduction in Head CT Performed for Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices: Effectiveness of a Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm.
Nagayama Y; Tanoue S; Oda S; Sakabe D; Emoto T; Kidoh M; Uetani H; Sasao A; Nakaura T; Ikeda O; Yamada K; Yamashita Y
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 31879332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Metal Artifact Reduction on Chest Computed Tomography Examinations: Comparison of the Iterative Metallic Artefact Reduction Algorithm and the Monoenergetic Approach.
Pagniez J; Legrand L; Khung S; Faivre JB; Duhamel A; Krauss A; Remy J; Remy-Jardin M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(3):446-454. PubMed ID: 28505625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Clinical relevance of metal artefact reduction in computed tomography (iMAR) in the pelvic and head and neck region: Multi-institutional contouring study of gross tumour volumes and organs at risk on clinical cases.
Hagen M; Kretschmer M; Würschmidt F; Gauer T; Giro C; Karsten E; Lorenzen J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 63(6):842-851. PubMed ID: 31265214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction.
Wellenberg RH; Boomsma MF; van Osch JA; Vlassenbroek A; Milles J; Edens MA; Streekstra GJ; Slump CH; Maas M
Skeletal Radiol; 2017 May; 46(5):623-632. PubMed ID: 28204857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Single-energy metal artifact reduction for helical computed tomography of the pelvis in patients with metal hip prostheses.
Yasaka K; Maeda E; Hanaoka S; Katsura M; Sato J; Ohtomo K
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):625-32. PubMed ID: 27400700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Comparison of Metal Artifact Reduction in Dual- and Single-Source CT: A Vertebral Phantom Study.
Jagoda P; Schmitz D; Wagenpfeil S; Bücker A; Minko P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1298-1305. PubMed ID: 30299998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. CT metal artifacts in patients with total hip replacements: for artifact reduction monoenergetic reconstructions and post-processing algorithms are both efficient but not similar.
Laukamp KR; Lennartz S; Neuhaus VF; Große Hokamp N; Rau R; Le Blanc M; Abdullayev N; Mpotsaris A; Maintz D; Borggrefe J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4524-4533. PubMed ID: 29725834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Improvement of image quality and diagnostic confidence using Smart MAR - a projection-based CT protocol in patients with orthopedic metallic implants in hip, spine, and shoulder.
Feldhaus FW; Böning G; Kahn J; Fehrenbach U; Maurer M; Renz D; Streitparth F
Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 32122149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Appropriate iMAR presets for metal artifact reduction from surgical clips and titanium burr hole covers on postoperative non-contrast brain CT.
Shinohara Y; Ohmura T; Sasaki F; Inomata T; Itoh T; Kinoshita T
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109811. PubMed ID: 34102563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
