These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35320411)

  • 1. Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI.
    Ma Y; Liu A; Zhang Y; Zhu Y; Wang Y; Zhao M; Liang Z; Qu Z; Yin L; Lu H; Ye Z
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Aug; 32(8):5773-5782. PubMed ID: 35320411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
    Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Reliability Comparison of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Mammography: Breast Density Assessment Referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
    Ma Y; Cao Y; Liu A; Yin L; Han P; Li H; Zhang X; Ye Z
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):752-759. PubMed ID: 30220584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT in Assessment of Residual Tumor after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparative Study with Breast MRI.
    Wang Y; Zhao M; Ma Y; Liu A; Zhu Y; Yin L; Liang Z; Qu Z; Lu H; Ma Y; Ye Z
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30(9):1805-1815. PubMed ID: 36610931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Could parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) represent a new breast cancer risk factor? Correlation with known radiology risk factors.
    Savaridas SL; Taylor DB; Gunawardana D; Phillips M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Dec; 72(12):1085.e1-1085.e9. PubMed ID: 28870431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT features of breast cancers: correlation with immunohistochemical receptors and molecular subtypes.
    Ma Y; Liu A; O'Connell AM; Zhu Y; Li H; Han P; Yin L; Lu H; Ye Z
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2580-2589. PubMed ID: 33009590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density.
    Wienbeck S; Uhlig J; Luftner-Nagel S; Zapf A; Surov A; von Fintel E; Stahnke V; Lotz J; Fischer U
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5185-5195. PubMed ID: 28677053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography for assessing breast cancer tumor size-comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Zhao M; Song X; Ma Y; Li Z; Wang Y; Liu A; Lu H; Ma Y; Ye Z
    Gland Surg; 2024 Mar; 13(3):281-296. PubMed ID: 38601282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy?
    Uhlig J; Fischer U; Biggemann L; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3141-3148. PubMed ID: 30488110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy.
    Uhlig J; Fischer U; Surov A; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():9-16. PubMed ID: 29362157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging.
    Sogani J; Morris EA; Kaplan JB; D'Alessio D; Goldman D; Moskowitz CS; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 27379544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between cone-beam breast-CT and full-field digital mammography for microcalcification detection depending on breast density.
    Wienbeck S; Andrijevska V; Kück F; Perske C; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Fischer U; Lotz J; Kunze M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jun; 102(22):e33900. PubMed ID: 37266644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of Clinical Factors and Degree of Early Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Wang S; Sun Y; You C; Jiang T; Yang M; Shen X; Qian M; Duan S; Lynn HS; Li R; Gu Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 36695647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging.
    Tavakoli Taba S; Baran P; Nesterets YI; Pacile S; Wienbeck S; Dullin C; Pavlov K; Maksimenko A; Lockie D; Mayo SC; Quiney HM; Dreossi D; Arfelli F; Tromba G; Lewis S; Gureyev TE; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 31974689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone-beam breast CT features associated with HER2/neu overexpression in patients with primary breast cancer.
    Zhu Y; Zhang Y; Ma Y; Li H; Liu A; Han P; Yin L; Lv N; Li Z; Lu H; Liu P; Ye Z
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2731-2739. PubMed ID: 31900700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Uhlig J; Uhlig A; Biggemann L; Fischer U; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 30255249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast computed tomography features and prognostic staging in breast cancer.
    Ma WM; Li J; Chen SG; Cai PQ; Chen S; Chen JT; Zhou CY; He N; Wu Y
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 95(1132):20210466. PubMed ID: 34930038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Background parenchymal enhancement assessment: Inter- and intra-rater reliability across breast MRI sequences.
    Bignotti B; Calabrese M; Signori A; Tosto S; Valdora F; Tagliafico A; Durando M; Mariscotti G
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():57-61. PubMed ID: 31005177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT values of contrast-enhanced CBBCT: A useful diagnostic tool for benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Wei W; Yi XL; Yang J; Liao H; Su D
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Aug; 64(8):2379-2386. PubMed ID: 37287251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe.
    Wienbeck S; Lotz J; Fischer U
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():50-59. PubMed ID: 27875762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.