These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35320794)
1. Harmonization of technical image quality in computed tomography: comparison between different reconstruction algorithms and kernels from six scanners. Juntunen MAK; Rautiainen J; Hänninen NE; Kotiaho AO Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Apr; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 35320794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic task-based image quality assessment of photon-counting and energy integrating CT as a function of reconstruction kernel and phantom size. Bhattarai M; Bache S; Abadi E; Samei E Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 37469179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for characterizing and matching CT image quality across CT scanners from different manufacturers. Winslow J; Zhang Y; Samei E Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5705-5717. PubMed ID: 28865170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of a deep learning-based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness. Zeng R; Lin CY; Li Q; Jiang L; Skopec M; Fessler JA; Myers KJ Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):836-853. PubMed ID: 34954845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study. Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of synthesized normal-resolution image data generated from high-resolution acquisitions on a commercial CT scanner. Hernandez AM; Shin DW; Abbey CK; Seibert JA; Akino N; Goto T; Vaishnav JY; Boedeker KL; Boone JM Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4775-4785. PubMed ID: 32677085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective performance assessment of five computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithms. Omotayo A; Elbakri I J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):913-930. PubMed ID: 27612054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions. Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical Note: Scanner dependence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction with 3D noise power spectrum central frequency and noise magnitude ratios. Hasegawa A; Ishihara T; Allan Thomas M; Pan T Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):4993-5003. PubMed ID: 34287936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR-V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR. De Marco P; Origgi D J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):275-286. PubMed ID: 29363260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol. Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the effects of variation in CT scanning parameters on the image quality and Hounsfield units for optimization of dose in radiotherapy treatment planning: A semi-anthropomorphic thorax phantom study. Sorooshfard E; Tahmasbi M; Chegeni N; Tahmasebi Birgani MJ J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(2):426-434. PubMed ID: 37006077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image Quality Measured From Ultra-Low Dose Chest Computed Tomography Examination Protocols Using 6 Different Iterative Reconstructions From 4 Vendors, a Phantom Study. Afadzi M; Fosså K; Andersen HK; Aaløkken TM; Martinsen ACT J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 31939889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm. Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photon Counting Computed Tomography With Dedicated Sharp Convolution Kernels: Tapping the Potential of a New Technology for Stent Imaging. von Spiczak J; Mannil M; Peters B; Hickethier T; Baer M; Henning A; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Manka R; Maintz D; Alkadhi H Invest Radiol; 2018 Aug; 53(8):486-494. PubMed ID: 29794949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two deep learning image reconstruction algorithms in chest CT images: A task-based image quality assessment on phantom data. Greffier J; Frandon J; Si-Mohamed S; Dabli D; Hamard A; Belaouni A; Akessoul P; Besse F; Guiu B; Beregi JP Diagn Interv Imaging; 2022 Jan; 103(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 34493475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of radiation dose for CT detection of lytic and sclerotic bone lesions: a phantom study. Greffier J; Frandon J; Pereira F; Hamard A; Beregi JP; Larbi A; Omoumi P Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1075-1078. PubMed ID: 31506818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models. Einstein SA; Rong XJ; Jensen CT; Liu X J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):174-178. PubMed ID: 31859454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative comparison of noise texture across CT scanners from different manufacturers. Solomon JB; Christianson O; Samei E Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6048-55. PubMed ID: 23039643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom. Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]