These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3532112)
1. Promoters selected from random DNA sequences. Horwitz MS; Loeb LA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1986 Oct; 83(19):7405-9. PubMed ID: 3532112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcription regulation in vitro by an E. coli promoter containing a DNA cruciform in the '-35' region. Horwitz MS Nucleic Acids Res; 1989 Jul; 17(14):5537-45. PubMed ID: 2668890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isolation of promoters from two anaerobic bacteria. Roberts I; Hylemon PB; Holmes WM Microbios; 1988; 54(219):87-99. PubMed ID: 2459583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA sequences of random origin as probes of Escherichia coli promoter architecture. Horwitz MS; Loeb LA J Biol Chem; 1988 Oct; 263(29):14724-31. PubMed ID: 3049585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene rearrangements leading to the expression of an insertion-inactivated tetracycline resistance gene in pBR322. Brunel F; Heusterspreute M; Merchez M; Ha Thi V; Pilaete MF; Davison J Plasmid; 1983 Mar; 9(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 6304796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcription initiation at the tet promoter and effect of mutations. Harley CB; Lawrie J; Betlach M; Crea R; Boyer HW; Hedgpeth J Nucleic Acids Res; 1988 Aug; 16(15):7269-85. PubMed ID: 3045754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consensus symmetry pattern in E. coli promoter sequences. Pivec L; Rozkot F; Sázelová P; Vítek A Folia Biol (Praha); 1985; 31(3):213-34. PubMed ID: 3894062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining the consensus sequences of E.coli promoter elements by random selection. Oliphant AR; Struhl K Nucleic Acids Res; 1988 Aug; 16(15):7673-83. PubMed ID: 3045761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tetracycline promoter mutations decrease non-B DNA structural transitions, negative linking differences and deletions in recombinant plasmids in Escherichia coli. Jaworski A; Blaho JA; Larson JE; Shimizu M; Wells RD J Mol Biol; 1989 Jun; 207(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 2547968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjacent upstream superhelical writhe influences an Escherichia coli promoter as measured by in vivo strength and in vitro open complex formation. Hirota Y; Ohyama T J Mol Biol; 1995 Dec; 254(4):566-78. PubMed ID: 7500334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The sequence upstream of the -10 consensus sequence modulates the strength and induction time of stationary-phase promoters in Escherichia coli. Miksch G; Bettenworth F; Friehs K; Flaschel E Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Dec; 69(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 16088348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The tac promoter: a functional hybrid derived from the trp and lac promoters. de Boer HA; Comstock LJ; Vasser M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1983 Jan; 80(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 6337371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification and sequence of a tet(M) tetracycline resistance determinant homologue in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Jones CH; Tuckman M; Murphy E; Bradford PA J Bacteriol; 2006 Oct; 188(20):7151-64. PubMed ID: 17015654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of E.coli promoter structures using neural networks. Mahadevan I; Ghosh I Nucleic Acids Res; 1994 Jun; 22(11):2158-65. PubMed ID: 8029027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of DNA bending in various regions of a consensus-like Escherichia coli promoter on its strength in vivo and structure of the open complex in vitro. Lozinski T; Adrych-Rozek K; Markiewicz WT; Wierzchowski K Nucleic Acids Res; 1991 Jun; 19(11):2947-53. PubMed ID: 2057353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]