These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35321685)

  • 41. Long-term follow-up results and radiographic findings of anterior surgery with Cloward trephination for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Xu BS; Zhang ZL; Le Huec JC; Xia Q; Hu YC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 19342932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prognostic value of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Hu Y; Ding Y; Ruan D; Wong YW; Cheung KM; Luk KD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):E305-10. PubMed ID: 18449030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The radiological characteristics associated with the development of myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments at each responsible level based on spinal cord evoked potentials.
    Funaba M; Imajo Y; Suzuki H; Nishida N; Nagao Y; Sakamoto T; Sakai T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 194():105814. PubMed ID: 32298951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between preoperative factors and the presence of intramedullary increased signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Wei L; Cao P; Xu C; Liu Y; Chen H; Wang X; Tian Y; Yuan W
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 178():1-6. PubMed ID: 30660852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Relationship Between Improvements in Myelopathy and Sagittal Realignment in Cervical Deformity Surgery Outcomes.
    Passias PG; Horn SR; Bortz CA; Ramachandran S; Burton DC; Protopsaltis T; Lafage R; Lafage V; Diebo BG; Poorman GW; Segreto FA; Smith JS; Ames C; Shaffrey CI; Kim HJ; Neuman B; Daniels AH; Soroceanu A; Klineberg E;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Aug; 43(16):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 29462071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Advanced MRI metrics improve the prediction of baseline disease severity for individuals with degenerative cervical myelopathy.
    Al-Shawwa A; Ost K; Anderson D; Cho N; Evaniew N; Jacobs WB; Martin AR; Gaekwad R; Tripathy S; Bouchard J; Casha S; Cho R; duPlessis S; Lewkonia P; Nicholls F; Salo PT; Soroceanu A; Swamy G; Thomas KC; Yang MMH; Cohen-Adad J; Cadotte DW
    Spine J; 2024 Sep; 24(9):1605-1614. PubMed ID: 38679077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does K-line (-) in the Neck-flexed Position Predict Surgical Outcome of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?: Results of a Multivariate Analysis After Muscle-preserving Selective Laminectomy.
    Nori S; Aoyama R; Ninomiya K; Suzuki S; Anazawa U; Shiraishi T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(19):E1225-E1231. PubMed ID: 32453238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The evolution of T2-weighted intramedullary signal changes following ventral decompressive surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Clinical article.
    Sarkar S; Turel MK; Jacob KS; Chacko AG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):538-46. PubMed ID: 25014501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Kim B; Yoon DH; Shin HC; Kim KN; Yi S; Shin DA; Ha Y
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):875-84. PubMed ID: 25637468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Flexion-extension cervical spine MRI in children with skeletal dysplasia: is it safe and effective?
    Mackenzie WG; Dhawale AA; Demczko MM; Ditro C; Rogers KJ; Bober MB; Campbell JW; Grissom LE
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Jan; 33(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 23232386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Intraoperative alignment goals for distinctive sagittal morphotypes of severe cervical deformity to achieve optimal improvements in health-related quality of life measures.
    Virk S; Passias P; Lafage R; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Bess S; Burton D; Hart R; Kim HJ; Ames C; Schwab F; Smith J; Lafage V;
    Spine J; 2020 Aug; 20(8):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 32209421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of clinical and radiological parameters on the likelihood of neurological improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.
    Toop N; Gifford CS; McGahan BG; Gibbs D; Miracle S; Schwab JM; Motiei-Langroudi R; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Jan; 38(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 35986727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Alafifi T; Kern R; Fehlings M
    J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Correlation between the severity of myelopathy and cervical morphometric parameters on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.
    Tykocki T; du Plessis J; Wynne-Jones G
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 Jun; 160(6):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 29687255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Increased spinal cord movements in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Vavasour IM; Meyers SM; MacMillan EL; Mädler B; Li DK; Rauscher A; Vertinsky T; Venu V; MacKay AL; Curt A
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2344-54. PubMed ID: 24462810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prediction of clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy focusing on spinal cord motion in intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
    Naruse T; Yanase M; Takahashi H; Horie Y; Ito M; Imaizumi T; Oguri K; Matsuyama Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2634-41. PubMed ID: 19910766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Relationship Between MRI Signal Intensity Changes, Clinical Presentation, and Surgical Outcome in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of a Global Cohort.
    Nouri A; Martin AR; Kato S; Reihani-Kermani H; Riehm LE; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):1851-1858. PubMed ID: 28498290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Is laminectomy and fusion the better choice than laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy with signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging? A comparison of two posterior surgeries.
    He X; Zhang JN; Liu TJ; Hao DJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jul; 21(1):423. PubMed ID: 32615953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Analysis of Morphometric Parameters in Cervical Canal Stenosis on Neutral and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Tykocki T; du Plessis J; Wynne-Jones G
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e317-e322. PubMed ID: 29524700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.