170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35323362)
1. Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.
Gotfrit J; Jackson A; Shin JJW; Stewart DJ; Mallick R; Wheatley-Price P
Curr Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 35323362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Submitted for Reimbursement Recommendation Decisions in Canada.
Meyers DE; Jenei K; Chisamore TM; Gyawali B
JAMA Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 181(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 33616606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study.
Lexchin J
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e030750. PubMed ID: 31350254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conditional approval of cancer drugs in Canada: accountability and impact on public funding.
Andersen SK; Penner N; Chambers A; Trudeau ME; Chan KKW; Cheung MC
Curr Oncol; 2019 Feb; 26(1):e100-e105. PubMed ID: 30853815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review on provincial concordance with respect to cancer drug funding decisions and time to funding.
Srikanthan A; Mai H; Penner N; Amir E; Laupacis A; Sabharwal M; Chan KKW
Curr Oncol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 29089796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining the association between oncology drug clinical benefit and the time to public reimbursement.
Thomson S; Everest L; Witzke N; Jiao T; Delos Santos S; Nguyen V; Cheung MC; Chan KKW
Cancer Med; 2022 Jan; 11(2):380-391. PubMed ID: 34850587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New Cancer Drug Approvals From the Perspective of a Universal Healthcare System: Analyses of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Recommendations.
Niraula S; Nugent Z
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Dec; 16(12):1460-1466. PubMed ID: 30545993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding the reasons for provincial discordance in cancer drug funding-a survey of policymakers.
Srikanthan A; Penner N; Chan KKW; Sabharwal M; Grill A
Curr Oncol; 2018 Aug; 25(4):257-261. PubMed ID: 30111966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Oncology Drug Review Times on Public Funding Recommendations.
Hussain M; Wong C; Taguedong E; Verma S; Mahsin M; Karim S; Lee-Ying R; Ezeife DA
Curr Oncol; 2023 Aug; 30(8):7706-7712. PubMed ID: 37623039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand.
McCormick JI; Berescu LD; Tadros N
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2018 Jan; 13(1):27. PubMed ID: 29382371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health-related quality of life in oncology drug reimbursement submissions in Canada: A review of submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.
Raymakers AJN; Regier DA; Peacock SJ
Cancer; 2020 Jan; 126(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 31544234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value assessment in oncology drugs: funding of drugs for metastatic breast cancer in Canada.
Lemieux J; Audet S
Curr Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(Suppl 1):S161-S170. PubMed ID: 29910659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics of clinician input in Canadian funding decisions for cancer drugs: a cross-sectional study based on CADTH reimbursement recommendations.
Jenei K; Meyers DE
BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e066378. PubMed ID: 37844982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value-based pricing: Toward achieving a balance between individual and population gains in health benefits.
Parmar A; Jiao T; Saluja R; Chan KKW
Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 31711274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada.
Gotfrit J; Shin JJW; Mallick R; Stewart DJ; Wheatley-Price P
Oncologist; 2020 Jan; 25(1):e130-e137. PubMed ID: 31506392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.
Rawson NSB; Stewart DJ
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2024; 16():437-445. PubMed ID: 38812711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenges in striving to simultaneously achieve multiple resource allocation goals: the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) example.
McDonald H; Charles C; Elit L; Gafni A
J Mark Access Health Policy; 2016; 4():. PubMed ID: 27489586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disparity in public funding of systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Canada.
Jackson EB; Hotte SJ
Can Urol Assoc J; 2022 Nov; 16(11):E516-E522. PubMed ID: 35704937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategizing health technology assessment for containment of cancer drug costs in a universal health care system: Case of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.
Niraula S
Cancer; 2019 Sep; 125(18):3100-3103. PubMed ID: 31154671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with positive and negative recommendations for cancer and non-cancer drugs for rare diseases in Canada.
Nagase FNI; Stafinski T; Sun J; Jhangri G; Menon D
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2019 Jun; 14(1):127. PubMed ID: 31174574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
