These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of a synthetic chemical lure and standard fermented baits for trapping Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Cha DH; Hesler SP; Cowles RS; Vogt H; Loeb GM; Landolt PJ Environ Entomol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1052-60. PubMed ID: 24331615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Olfactory Preference of Clymans R; Van Kerckvoorde V; Bangels E; Akkermans W; Alhmedi A; De Clercq P; Beliën T; Bylemans D Insects; 2019 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 31284591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Commercial Lures and Food Baits for Early Detection of Fruit Infestation Risk by Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Cha DH; Hesler SP; Wallingford AK; Zaman F; Jentsch P; Nyrop J; Loeb GM J Econ Entomol; 2018 Apr; 111(2):645-652. PubMed ID: 29365137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agricultural-Grade Apple Cider Vinegar Is Remarkably Attractive to Lasa R; Aguas-Lanzagorta S; Williams T Insects; 2020 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 32679914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of trap design, bait type, and age on captures of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in berry crops. Iglesias LE; Nyoike TW; Liburd OE J Econ Entomol; 2014 Aug; 107(4):1508-18. PubMed ID: 25195443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multistate Comparison of Attractants and the Impact of Fruit Development Stage on Trapping Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Raspberry and Blueberry. Jaffe BD; Avanesyan A; Bal HK; Feng Y; Grant J; Grieshop MJ; Lee JC; Liburd OE; Rhodes E; Rodriguez-Saona C; Sial AA; Zhang A; Guédot C Environ Entomol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):935-945. PubMed ID: 29668869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Brown Rice Vinegar as an Olfactory Field Attractant for Willbrand BN; Pfeiffer DG Insects; 2019 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30897772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The attractant, but not the trap design, affects the capture of Cruz-Esteban S; Garay-Serrano E; Rodríguez C; Rojas JC Bull Entomol Res; 2021 Apr; 111(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 32677596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Monitoring Traps and Lures for Harmon DS; Haseeb M; Kanga LHB; Liburd OE Insects; 2019 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 31554218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved capture of Drosophila suzukii by a trap baited with two attractants in the same device. Lasa R; Tadeo E; Toledo-Hérnandez RA; Carmona L; Lima I; Williams T PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188350. PubMed ID: 29149190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Raspberry as a Source for the Development of Lasa R; Toledo-Hernández RA; Rodríguez D; Williams T Insects; 2019 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 31083484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tunnel entries and a killing agent uncover the importance of fly retention in Drosophila suzukii traps. Van Kerckvoorde V; Clymans R; Bangels E; Alhmedi A; De Ketelaere B; De Clercq P; Bylemans D; Belien T Pest Manag Sci; 2020 Oct; 76(10):3459-3468. PubMed ID: 32520421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a Novel Dry, Sticky Trap Design Incorporating Visual Cues for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Kirkpatrick DM; Gut LJ; Miller JR J Econ Entomol; 2018 Aug; 111(4):1775-1779. PubMed ID: 29697825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]