These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35324543)

  • 1. Avoidable bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at hysterectomy: a large retrospective study.
    Iancu AM; Murji A; Chow O; Shapiro J; Cipolla A; Shirreff L
    Menopause; 2022 May; 29(5):523-530. PubMed ID: 35324543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unnecessary bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy and potential for ovarian preservation.
    Wong J; Murji A; Sunderji Z; Chow O; Shapiro J; Wolfman W; Shirreff L
    Menopause; 2020 Sep; 28(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 32898023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concomitant Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy at Hysterectomy: Differences by Race and Menopausal Status in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 2007-2014.
    Bossick AS; Katon JG; Gray KE; Ma EW; Callegari LS
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Dec; 29(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 33095114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practice variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign abdominal hysterectomy: a population-based study.
    Cusimano MC; Moineddin R; Chiu M; Ferguson SE; Aktar S; Liu N; Baxter NN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):585.e1-585.e30. PubMed ID: 33359174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent uterine surgery and uptake of hormone therapy in patients undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for risk-reducing or therapeutic indications.
    Sasse SA; Lee SS; Rajeev P; Sharma SR; Kahan T; Pothuri B
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 179():131-137. PubMed ID: 37988946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence of ovarian cancer after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with histologically proven endometriosis.
    Hermens M; van Altena AM; Bulten J; van Vliet HAAM; Siebers AG; Bekkers RLM
    Fertil Steril; 2022 May; 117(5):938-945. PubMed ID: 35300832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reoperation and pain-related outcomes after hysterectomy for endometriosis by oophorectomy status.
    Long AJ; Kaur P; Lukey A; Allaire C; Kwon JS; Talhouk A; Yong PJ; Hanley GE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):57.e1-57.e18. PubMed ID: 36029832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.
    Jacoby VL; Vittinghoff E; Nakagawa S; Jackson R; Richter HE; Chan J; Kuppermann M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 113(6):1259-1267. PubMed ID: 19461420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of benign hysterectomy among females with disabilities: a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Scime NV; Brown HK; Metcalfe A; Simpson AN; Brennand EA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):658.e1-658.e17. PubMed ID: 37544349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ovarian cancer incidence and death in average-risk women undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign hysterectomy.
    Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE; Moineddin R; Chiu M; Aktar S; Liu N; Baxter NN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):220.e1-220.e26. PubMed ID: 34563499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a feasibility study for further evaluation in randomized trials.
    Nwosu CR; Gupta JK
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Feb; 13(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 9918618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Salpingo-oophorectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.
    Evans EC; Matteson KA; Orejuela FJ; Alperin M; Balk EM; El-Nashar S; Gleason JL; Grimes C; Jeppson P; Mathews C; Wheeler TL; Murphy M;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 128(3):476-85. PubMed ID: 27500347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Revised Markov Model Evaluating Oophorectomy at the Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indication: Age 65 Years Revisited.
    Rush SK; Ma X; Newton MA; Rose SL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 139(5):735-744. PubMed ID: 35576331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Variations by History of Military Service and Birth Cohort.
    Callegari LS; Gray KE; Zephyrin LC; Harrington LB; Gerber MR; Cochrane BB; Weitlauf JC; Bean-Mayberry B; Bastian LA; Mattocks KM; Haskell SG; Katon JG
    Gerontologist; 2016 Feb; 56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S67-77. PubMed ID: 26768393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes of Israeli gynecologists towards risk reduction salpingo-oophorectomy at hysterectomy for benign conditions and the use of hormonal therapy.
    Assaf W; Andraous M; Lavie O; Segev Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():48-54. PubMed ID: 35279641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the feasibility of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse.
    Dain L; Abramov Y
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug; 51(4):307-9. PubMed ID: 21806584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uptake of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: a Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database report.
    Seppälä TT; Dominguez-Valentin M; Crosbie EJ; Engel C; Aretz S; Macrae F; Winship I; Capella G; Thomas H; Hovig E; Nielsen M; Sijmons RH; Bertario L; Bonanni B; Tibiletti MG; Cavestro GM; Mints M; Gluck N; Katz L; Heinimann K; Vaccaro CA; Green K; Lalloo F; Hill J; Schmiegel W; Vangala D; Perne C; Strauß HG; Tecklenburg J; Holinski-Feder E; Steinke-Lange V; Mecklin JP; Plazzer JP; Pineda M; Navarro M; Vida JB; Kariv R; Rosner G; Piñero TA; Pavicic W; Kalfayan P; Ten Broeke SW; Jenkins MA; Sunde L; Bernstein I; Burn J; Greenblatt M; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Della Valle A; Lopez-Koestner F; Alvarez K; Büttner R; Görgens H; Morak M; Holzapfel S; Hüneburg R; von Knebel Doeberitz M; Loeffler M; Redler S; Weitz J; Pylvänäinen K; Renkonen-Sinisalo L; Lepistö A; Hopper JL; Win AK; Lindor NM; Gallinger S; Le Marchand L; Newcomb PA; Figueiredo JC; Thibodeau SN; Therkildsen C; Wadt KAW; Mourits MJE; Ketabi Z; Denton OG; Rødland EA; Vasen H; Neffa F; Esperon P; Tjandra D; Möslein G; Rokkones E; Sampson JR; Evans DG; Møller P
    Eur J Cancer; 2021 May; 148():124-133. PubMed ID: 33743481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy--implications for gynecologic practice in the United Kingdom.
    Raju KS; Auld BJ
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Feb; 1(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9050471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A retrospective review of patient-reported outcomes on the impact on quality of life in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometriosis.
    Tan BK; Maillou K; Mathur RS; Prentice A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 23937796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adherence to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy guidelines among gynecologic oncologists compared to general gynecologists.
    Blustein P; Werner SR; Uppalapati P; Leung TM; Husk GA; Pereira EB; Whyte JS; Villella JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 229(3):280.e1-280.e8. PubMed ID: 37308046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.