143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35326633)
1. Familial Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
Nguyen TL; Li S; Dowty JG; Dite GS; Ye Z; Nguyen-Dumont T; Trinh HN; Evans CF; Tan M; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Giles GG; Southey MC; Hopper JL
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 35326633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
Li S; Nguyen TL; Nguyen-Dumont T; Dowty JG; Dite GS; Ye Z; Trinh HN; Evans CF; Tan M; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Southey MC
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 35681745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: a twins and sisters study.
Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Dite GS; Stone J; Apicella C; Bui M; Macinnis RJ; Odefrey F; Cawson JN; Treloar SA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Dec; 22(12):2395-403. PubMed ID: 24130221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic and Environmental Causes of Variation in an Automated Breast Cancer Risk Factor Based on Mammographic Textures.
Ye Z; Dite GS; Nguyen TL; MacInnis RJ; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Al-Qershi OM; Nguyen-Dumont T; Goudey B; Stone J; Dowty JG; Giles GG; Southey MC; Hopper JL; Li S
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2024 Feb; 33(2):306-313. PubMed ID: 38059829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic influences on mammographic density in Korean twin and family: the Healthy Twin study.
Sung J; Song YM; Stone J; Lee K; Jeong JI; Kim SS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 20349128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relative importance of genetics and environment on mammographic density.
Ursin G; Lillie EO; Lee E; Cockburn M; Schork NJ; Cozen W; Parisky YR; Hamilton AS; Astrahan MA; Mack T
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jan; 18(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 19124487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic models for the familial aggregation of mammographic breast density.
Kataoka M; Antoniou A; Warren R; Leyland J; Brown J; Audley T; Easton D
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Apr; 18(4):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19336563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inference about causation from examination of familial confounding: application to longitudinal twin data on mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk.
Stone J; Dite GS; Giles GG; Cawson J; English DR; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1149-55. PubMed ID: 22539605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.
Boyd NF; Dite GS; Stone J; Gunasekara A; English DR; McCredie MR; Giles GG; Tritchler D; Chiarelli A; Yaffe MJ; Hopper JL
N Engl J Med; 2002 Sep; 347(12):886-94. PubMed ID: 12239257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Maskarinec G; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; MacInnis RJ; Dugué PA; Dowty JG; Jenkins MA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Int J Cancer; 2021 May; 148(9):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 33197272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic patterns in twin pairs discordant for breast cancer.
Kaprio J; Alanko A; Kivisaari L; Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG
Br J Radiol; 1987 May; 60(713):459-62. PubMed ID: 3580756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are genetic and environmental components of variance in mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk independent of within-twin pair differences in body mass index?
Dite GS; Stone J; Chiarelli AM; Giles GG; English DR; Cawson JC; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(2):553-9. PubMed ID: 21874311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consistency and change of body mass index and weight. A study on 5967 adult Finnish twin pairs.
Korkeila M; Kaprio J; Rissanen A; Koskenvuo M
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1995 May; 19(5):310-7. PubMed ID: 7647822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic and environmental contributions to abdominal aortic aneurysm development in a twin population.
Wahlgren CM; Larsson E; Magnusson PK; Hultgren R; Swedenborg J
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jan; 51(1):3-7; discussion 7. PubMed ID: 19939604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Familial correlations in postmenopausal serum concentrations of sex steroid hormones and other mitogens: a twins and sisters study.
Stone J; Folkerd E; Doody D; Schroen C; Treloar SA; Giles GG; Pike MC; English DR; Southey MC; Hopper JL; Dowsett M
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2009 Dec; 94(12):4793-800. PubMed ID: 19850695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lifestyle, stress, and genes in peptic ulcer disease: a nationwide twin cohort study.
Räihä I; Kemppainen H; Kaprio J; Koskenvuo M; Sourander L
Arch Intern Med; 1998 Apr; 158(7):698-704. PubMed ID: 9554675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
