191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35328826)
1. Formate Dehydrogenase Improves the Resistance to Formic Acid and Acetic Acid Simultaneously in
Du C; Li Y; Xiang R; Yuan W
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 35328826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeated-batch fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysate to ethanol using a hybrid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain metabolically engineered for tolerance to acetic and formic acids.
Sanda T; Hasunuma T; Matsuda F; Kondo A
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Sep; 102(17):7917-24. PubMed ID: 21704512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inactivation of the transcription factor mig1 (YGL035C) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves tolerance towards monocarboxylic weak acids: acetic, formic and levulinic acid.
Balderas-Hernández VE; Correia K; Mahadevan R
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Aug; 45(8):735-751. PubMed ID: 29876685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deletion of JJJ1 improves acetic acid tolerance and bioethanol fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Wu X; Zhang L; Jin X; Fang Y; Zhang K; Qi L; Zheng D
Biotechnol Lett; 2016 Jul; 38(7):1097-106. PubMed ID: 27067354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inverse metabolic engineering based on transient acclimation of yeast improves acid-containing xylose fermentation and tolerance to formic and acetic acids.
Hasunuma T; Sakamoto T; Kondo A
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jan; 100(2):1027-38. PubMed ID: 26521247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving Acetic Acid and Furfural Resistance of Xylose-Fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains by Regulating Novel Transcription Factors Revealed via Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis.
Li B; Wang L; Wu YJ; Xia ZY; Yang BX; Tang YQ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 87(10):. PubMed ID: 33712428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Hasunuma T; Sanda T; Yamada R; Yoshimura K; Ishii J; Kondo A
Microb Cell Fact; 2011 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 21219616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional analysis of structural genes for NAD(+)-dependent formate dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Overkamp KM; Kötter P; van der Hoek R; Schoondermark-Stolk S; Luttik MA; van Dijken JP; Pronk JT
Yeast; 2002 Apr; 19(6):509-20. PubMed ID: 11921099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overexpression of RCK1 improves acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Oh EJ; Wei N; Kwak S; Kim H; Jin YS
J Biotechnol; 2019 Feb; 292():1-4. PubMed ID: 30615911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient fermentation of xylose to ethanol at high formic acid concentrations by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Hasunuma T; Sung KM; Sanda T; Yoshimura K; Matsuda F; Kondo A
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 May; 90(3):997-1004. PubMed ID: 21246355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved ethanol production from xylose in the presence of acetic acid by the overexpression of the HAA1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Sakihama Y; Hasunuma T; Kondo A
J Biosci Bioeng; 2015 Mar; 119(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 25282639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improvement of ethanol productivity and energy efficiency by degradation of inhibitors using recombinant Zymomonas mobilis (pHW20a-fdh).
Dong HW; Fan LQ; Luo Z; Zhong JJ; Ryu DD; Bao J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2013 Sep; 110(9):2395-404. PubMed ID: 23475631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metabolome analysis of the response and tolerance mechanisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to formic acid stress.
Zeng L; Si Z; Zhao X; Feng P; Huang J; Long X; Yi Y
Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2022 Jul; 148():106236. PubMed ID: 35688405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metabolic impact of increased NADH availability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Hou J; Scalcinati G; Oldiges M; Vemuri GN
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Feb; 76(3):851-9. PubMed ID: 20023106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive laboratory evolution under acetic acid stress enhances the multistress tolerance and ethanol production efficiency of Pichia kudriavzevii from lignocellulosic biomass.
Dolpatcha S; Phong HX; Thanonkeo S; Klanrit P; Yamada M; Thanonkeo P
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):21000. PubMed ID: 38017261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved growth and ethanol fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid by overexpression of SET5 and PPR1.
Zhang MM; Zhao XQ; Cheng C; Bai FW
Biotechnol J; 2015 Dec; 10(12):1903-11. PubMed ID: 26479519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening of Non- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Tolerance to Formic Acid in Bioethanol Fermentation.
Oshoma CE; Greetham D; Louis EJ; Smart KA; Phister TG; Powell C; Du C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135626. PubMed ID: 26284784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deletion of the PHO13 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysate in the presence of acetic and formic acids, and furfural.
Fujitomi K; Sanda T; Hasunuma T; Kondo A
Bioresour Technol; 2012 May; 111():161-6. PubMed ID: 22357292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement of inhibitor tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of the quinone oxidoreductase family gene YCR102C.
Chen H; Li J; Wan C; Fang Q; Bai F; Zhao X
FEMS Yeast Res; 2019 Sep; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 31374572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Omics analysis of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Geng P; Zhang L; Shi GY
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 May; 33(5):94. PubMed ID: 28405910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
