These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3533007)

  • 1. Pressure ulcer management in home health care: efficacy and cost effectiveness of moisture vapor permeable dressing.
    Sebern MD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Oct; 67(10):726-9. PubMed ID: 3533007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
    Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound healing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers.
    Souliotis K; Kalemikerakis I; Saridi M; Papageorgiou M; Kalokerinou A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2016 May; 24(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 27037729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
    Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
    Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic evaluation of the treatment of chronic wounds: hydroactive wound dressings in combination with enzymatic ointment versus gauze dressings in patients with pressure ulcer and venous leg ulcer in Germany.
    Bergemann R; Lauterbach KW; Vanscheidt W; Neander KD; Engst R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1999 Oct; 16(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 10623365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
    Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
    Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study.
    Ohlsson P; Larsson K; Lindholm C; Möller M
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Dec; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 7863149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Assess the Effect of Topical Insulin Versus Normal Saline in Pressure Ulcer Healing.
    Stephen S; Agnihotri M; Kaur S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Jun; 62(6):16-23. PubMed ID: 27356143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of an advanced wound dressing used in Iran.
    Kordestani S; Shahrezaee M; Tahmasebi MN; Hajimahmodi H; Haji Ghasemali D; Abyaneh MS
    J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):323-7. PubMed ID: 18705234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Collagen powder dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcer. Multicenter comparative study assessing effectiveness and cost].
    Bou Torra JE; Soldevilla Agreda JJ; Martínez Cuervo F; Rueda López J
    Rev Enferm; 2002 Sep; 25(9):50-7. PubMed ID: 13677749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?
    Albert NM; Rock R; Sammon MA; Bena JF; Morrison SL; Whitman A; Kato I; Landis-Erdman JC
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 22552107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group.
    Hansson C
    Int J Dermatol; 1998 May; 37(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 9620490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost effectiveness of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of exuding venous leg ulcers in Germany and the USA.
    Guest JF; Ruiz FJ; Mihai A; Lehman A
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Jan; 21(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15881478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of pressure ulcers with noncontact normothermic wound therapy: healing and warming effects.
    Whitney JD; Salvadalena G; Higa L; Mich M
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2001 Sep; 28(5):244-52. PubMed ID: 11557928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical study using activity-based costing to assess cost-effectiveness of a wound management system utilizing modern dressings in comparison with traditional wound care].
    Ohura T; Sanada H; Mino Y
    Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 41(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 14999922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of low-cost custom made VAC therapy compared with conventional wound dressings in the treatment of non-healing lower limb ulcers in lower socio-economic group patients of Kashmir valley.
    Ali Z; Anjum A; Khurshid L; Ahad H; Maajid S; Dhar SA
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 10():183. PubMed ID: 26654318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cost-effectiveness of wound management protocols of care.
    Harding K; Cutting K; Price P
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Oct; 9(19 Suppl):S6, S8, S10 passim. PubMed ID: 12271239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.