163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35330082)
1. Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study.
Mummolo S; Quinzi V; Nota A; Marino C; Pittari L; Manenti RJ; Tecco S
Life (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers.
Eroglu AK; Baka ZM; Arslan U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli and other salivary indices in patients wearing clear aligners versus fixed orthodontic appliances: An observational study.
Mummolo S; Nota A; Albani F; Marchetti E; Gatto R; Marzo G; Quinzi V; Tecco S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0228798. PubMed ID: 32330172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of salivary indices and levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus in patients treated with Occlus-o-Guide.
Mummolo S; Tieri M; Tecco S; Mattei A; Albani F; Giuca MR; Marzo G
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 25517581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers.
Al-Nimri K; Al Habashneh R; Obeidat M
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20043549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Streptococcus mutans counts in patients wearing removable retainers with silver nanoparticles vs those wearing conventional retainers: A randomized clinical trial.
Farhadian N; Usefi Mashoof R; Khanizadeh S; Ghaderi E; Farhadian M; Miresmaeili A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 26827971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does quality of orthodontic treatment outcome influence post-treatment stability? A retrospective study investigating short-term stability 2 years after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and in the presence of fixed retainers.
Gera A; Gera S; Cattaneo PM; Cornelis MA
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Aug; 25(3):368-376. PubMed ID: 34738713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Striving for Perfection: How Stable Is Orthodontic Treatment When Excellent Outcomes Are Achieved? A 9-Year Post-Treatment Retrospective Study.
Cornelis MA; Gera A; Gera S; Isenshtat A; Cattaneo PM
J Clin Med; 2023 Dec; 12(24):. PubMed ID: 38137761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized controlled trial on the comparative clinical efficiency and hygiene of a ceramic inter locking retainer and a flexible spiral wire bonded retainer.
Sinha A; Sonar S; Batra P; Raghavan S
Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 34810385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers.
Artun J; Spadafora AT; Shapiro PA
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Oct; 19(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 9386336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in the oral environment after placement of lingual and labial orthodontic appliances.
Lombardo L; Ortan YÖ; Gorgun Ö; Panza C; Scuzzo G; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():28. PubMed ID: 24326120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of three orthodontic retainers on periodontal pathogens and periodontal parameters.
Li B; Lu C; Yao X; Wu X; Wu G; Zeng X
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20709. PubMed ID: 38001102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: An 8-year follow-up.
Steinnes J; Johnsen G; Kerosuo H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 28554448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D-analysis of unwanted tooth movements despite bonded orthodontic retainers: a pilot study.
Klaus K; Xirouchaki F; Ruf S
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):308. PubMed ID: 33148238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial.
Steegmans PAJ; Cavagnetto D; Reynders RAM
Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study.
Ferreira LA; Sapata DM; Provenzano MGA; Hayacibara RM; Ramos AL
Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Aug; 24(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 31390451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers.
Arash V; Teimoorian M; Farajzadeh Jalali Y; Sheikhzadeh S
Prog Orthod; 2020 Jun; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 32596755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial.
Alrawas MB; Kashoura Y; Tosun Ö; Öz U
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 May; 24(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 32865325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Comparing the effectiveness, acceptability and oral hygiene status between vacuum formed retainer and Begg's retainer": a pilot study.
Patnaik P; Nanda SB; Mishra S
BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):266. PubMed ID: 37161557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of changes in Streptococcus mutans colonies in microflora of the Indian population with fixed orthodontics appliances.
Shukla C; Maurya RK; Singh V; Tijare M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 27605987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
