These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35330489)
1. Effects of Artificial Extraoral Markers on Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Dentofacial Image Integration: Smartphone Face Scan versus Stereophotogrammetry. Mai HN; Lee DH J Pers Med; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Perioral Scan and Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracy of Virtual Dentofacial Integration: Stereophotogrammetry Versus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning. Mai HN; Lee DH Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33396780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system. Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of a patient 3-dimensional virtual representation obtained from the superimposition of facial and intraoral scans guided by extraoral and intraoral scan body systems. Revilla-León M; Zandinejad A; Nair MK; Barmak AB; Feilzer AJ; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):984-993. PubMed ID: 33838919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between stereophotogrammetry and smartphone structured light technology for three-dimensional face scanning. D'Ettorre G; Farronato M; Candida E; Quinzi V; Grippaudo C Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):358-363. PubMed ID: 35015071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the accuracy of digital stereophotogrammetry and projection moiré profilometry for three-dimensional imaging of the face. Artopoulos A; Buytaert JA; Dirckx JJ; Coward TJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 43(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24225265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records. Li J; Chen Z; Decker AM; Wang HL; Joda T; Mendonca G; Lepidi L J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integration of a maxillary model into facial surface stereophotogrammetry. Bechtold TE; Göz TG; Schaupp E; Koos B; Godt A; Reinert S; Berneburg M J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Apr; 73(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 22383061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study. Pan F; Liu J; Cen Y; Chen Y; Cai R; Zhao Z; Liao W; Wang J J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104302. PubMed ID: 36152954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the influence of the facial scanning method on the transfer accuracy of a maxillary digital scan to a 3D face scan for a virtual facebow technique: An in vitro study. Amezua X; Iturrate M; Garikano X; Solaberrieta E J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1024-1031. PubMed ID: 33722381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review. Quinzi V; Polizzi A; Ronsivalle V; Santonocito S; Conforte C; Manenti RJ; Isola G; Lo Giudice A Children (Basel); 2022 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 36138698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of 3D Face-Scan images obtained by stereophotogrammetry and smartphone camera. Akan B; Akan E; Şahan AO; Kalak M Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):669-678. PubMed ID: 34544662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study. Tohme H; Lawand G; Chmielewska M; Makhzoume J J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):354-362. PubMed ID: 34112521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant-supported mandibular complete arch-fixed prosthesis: An in vitro study. Kosago P; Ungurawasaporn C; Kukiattrakoon B J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):616-624. PubMed ID: 36083233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods. Pereira ALC; Segundo HVM; Júnior LCA; Germano AR; Carreiro ADFP J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):279-287. PubMed ID: 36511059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan. Park SW; Yoon RG; Lee H; Lee HJ; Choi YD; Lee DH Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32882986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smartphone-Based Facial Scanning as a Viable Tool for Facially Driven Orthodontics? Thurzo A; Strunga M; Havlínová R; Reháková K; Urban R; Surovková J; Kurilová V Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative Accuracy of Facial Models Fabricated Using Traditional and 3D Imaging Techniques. Lincoln KP; Sun AY; Prihoda TJ; Sutton AJ J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 26381058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation. Rosati R; De Menezes M; Rossetti A; Sforza C; Ferrario VF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 20620838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]