146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35331924)
1. Comparison of open versus minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar metastases.
Ntilikina Y; Collinet A; Tigan LV; Fabacher T; Steib JP; Charles YP
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 108(4):103274. PubMed ID: 35331924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Pranata R; Lim MA; Vania R; Bagus Mahadewa TG
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e264-e274. PubMed ID: 33418123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Potential of Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Metastatic Spinal Disease versus Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lu VM; Alvi MA; Goyal A; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M
World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():e859-e868. PubMed ID: 29408300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation techniques for metastatic spinal disease.
Rao PJ; Thayaparan GK; Fairhall JM; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2014 Aug; 6(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 25179352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis: A Prospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Hansen-Algenstaedt N; Kwan MK; Algenstaedt P; Chiu CK; Viezens L; Chan TS; Lee CK; Wellbrock J; Chan CYW; Schaefer C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(10):789-797. PubMed ID: 27584676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients.
Haque RM; Mundis GM; Ahmed Y; El Ahmadieh TY; Wang MY; Mummaneni PV; Uribe JS; Okonkwo DO; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Kanter AS; La Marca F; Akbarnia BA; Park P; Lafage V; Terran JS; Shaffrey CI; Klineberg E; Deviren V; Fessler RG;
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E13. PubMed ID: 24785478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results.
Miscusi M; Polli FM; Forcato S; Ricciardi L; Frati A; Cimatti M; De Martino L; Ramieri A; Raco A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 25723122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.
Ang CL; Phak-Boon Tow B; Fook S; Guo CM; Chen JL; Yue WM; Tan SB
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1705-12. PubMed ID: 24094717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgical techniques.
Uribe JS; Deukmedjian AR; Mummaneni PV; Fu KM; Mundis GM; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Eastlack R; Wang MY; Anand N; Fessler RG; La Marca F; Park P; Lafage V; Deviren V; Bess S; Shaffrey CI;
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E15. PubMed ID: 24785480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive lateral corpectomy for thoracolumbar traumatic burst fractures.
Podet AG; Morrow KD; Robichaux JM; Shields JA; DiGiorgio AM; Tender GC
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E12. PubMed ID: 32871572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.
Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Abe Y; Minami A
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 22173610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
