157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35332369)
21. Initial experience of robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: 61 consecutive cases from a single Chinese institution.
Zhang Y; Xiang J; Han Y; Huang M; Hang J; Abbas AE; Li H
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Dec; 31(12):. PubMed ID: 29873693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A pilot randomized controlled trial on the utility of gastric conditioning in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The APIL_2013 Trial.
Mils K; Miró M; Farran L; Videla S; Alba E; Estremiana F; Bettonica C; Aranda H
Int J Surg; 2022 Oct; 106():106921. PubMed ID: 36116675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Zhang Y; Han Y; Gan Q; Xiang J; Jin R; Chen K; Che J; Hang J; Li H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1284-1291. PubMed ID: 30843161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center.
Hamouda AH; Forshaw MJ; Tsigritis K; Jones GE; Noorani AS; Rohatgi A; Botha AJ
Surg Endosc; 2010 Apr; 24(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 19730947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
Capovilla G; Hadzijusufovic E; Tagkalos E; Froiio C; Berlth F; Mann C; Staubitz J; Uzun E; Lang H; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Aug; 35(8):. PubMed ID: 34979549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Single Intercostal Space Thoracoscopic Approach for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Pan S; Wang L; Wu M; Wang Q; Shen G; Chen G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 28504587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant Chemoradiation with minimal overall and anastomotic complications.
Merritt RE; Kneuertz PJ; D'Souza DM; Perry KA
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Jun; 14(1):123. PubMed ID: 31253184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intrathoracic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy with a linear stapler and barbed suture in robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Wang F; Zhang H; Zheng Y; Wang Z; Geng Y; Wang Y
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 120(7):1142-1147. PubMed ID: 31535396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robot-assisted transthoracic hybrid esophagectomy versus open and laparoscopic hybrid esophagectomy: propensity score matched analysis of short-term outcome.
Reinstaller T; Adolf D; Lorenz E; Croner RS; Benedix F
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3357-3365. PubMed ID: 36066670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Introduction of laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy as hybrid procedure and comparison with open esophagectomy. A propensity-matched retrospective study.
Spiliotis AE; Gäbelein G; Malinowski M; Holländer S; Scherber PR; Glanemann M
Minerva Surg; 2022 Feb; 77(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 35315265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Tapias LF; Morse CR
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of age on short-term and mid-term outcomes after thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Martin F; Kröll D; Knitter S; Hofmann T; Raakow J; Denecke C; Pratschke J; Biebl M
BMC Surg; 2021 Dec; 21(1):431. PubMed ID: 34930248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic esophagectomy: results from a tertiary care Italian center.
Guerra F; Gia E; Minuzzo A; Tribuzi A; Di Marino M; Coratti A
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 33861402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intrathoracic Robotic-Sewn Anastomosis During Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: Back to Basics?
Huscher CGS; Cobellis F; Lazzarin G
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 May; 27(5):1034-1041. PubMed ID: 36732403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: safety, perioperative morbidity and short-term oncological outcome-a single institution experience.
Sayed AI; Goel S; Aggarwal A; Singh S
J Robot Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 34228249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
