These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35332407)

  • 41. Non-Surgical Correction of Congenital Ear Anomalies: A Critical Assessment of Caretaker Burdens and Aesthetic Outcomes.
    Dinis J; Junn A; Long A; Phillips S; Reategui A; Kaplan A; Alperovich M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(2):898-906. PubMed ID: 34608514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Study of Using 3D Scan Technique to Evaluate the Expanding Method of Ear Reconstruction Before Operation.
    Wan R; Xie W; Li Z; Zhou J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Apr; 44(2):359-364. PubMed ID: 31332458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Practical Classification and Management of Accessory Auricle.
    Li Q; Sheng Y; Jiang Z; Cui W; Cai Z; Chen Z
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 May; 48(9):1653-1662. PubMed ID: 37968471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Course of Superficial Temporal Artery in Patients with Microtia and its Relationship with the Remnant.
    Fu YY; Gao XL; Li CL; Zhang TY
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(4):1706-1712. PubMed ID: 35386006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Modified Rhytidectomy that Produces a More Natural Look: Experience with 110 Cases.
    Man D
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 27353877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Titanium mesh strut: a novel instrument for firm elevation of the reconstructed auricle.
    Li D; Zhang R; Zhang Q; Xu F; Xu Z; Tang X
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Jun; 36(3):746-9. PubMed ID: 22350306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Antihelical shaping of prominent ears using conchal cartilage-grafting adhesion.
    Park C; Jeong TW
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1238-45. PubMed ID: 22549915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The 'WiFi' otoplasty : Combined concentric posterior microchondrectomies and sutures for correction of prominent ears.
    Hendrickx BIMM; Hamdi M; Zeltzer A; Greensmith A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jun; 71(6):900-905. PubMed ID: 29472155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Precision in otoplasty: combining reduction otoplasty with traditional otoplasty.
    Sinno S; Chang JB; Thorne CH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 May; 135(5):1342-1348. PubMed ID: 25919248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Caudal Septal Extension Graft Sutured with Absorbable Material and Not Fixed to the Nasal Spine Region Compared with the Conventional Fixation Method: A Retrospective Study.
    Benavides G; Villate P; Malaver C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 43(3):759-767. PubMed ID: 30815733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Efficacy and Timing of Neonatal Ear Correction Molding.
    Zhuang Q; Wei N; Zhou Q; Wang H; Wu Y; Chen Z; Yu D; Wang P; Shi H
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Jun; 44(3):872-878. PubMed ID: 31965228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A Modification of the Posterior Perichondrio-Adipo-Dermal Flap for Protruding Ear Correction: A Customized Technique.
    Ersen B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 83(5):500-506. PubMed ID: 31609804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Splitted posterior auricular muscle flap combined with traditional otoplasty.
    Karaaslan O; Sonmez E; Silistreli OK; Can M; Caliskan G; Bedir YK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1350-2. PubMed ID: 23851805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Otoplasty for prominent ears - demographics and surgical timing in different populations.
    Kajosaari L; Pennanen J; Klockars T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 100():52-56. PubMed ID: 28802386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of Rapid Absorbable Sutures with Nonabsorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Septorhinoplasty: Short-term Outcomes.
    Erol O; Buyuklu F; Koycu A; Jafarov S; Gultekin G; Erbek SS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Oct; 44(5):1759-1765. PubMed ID: 32700009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Analyses of the factors relevant to revision tympanomastoid surgery].
    Li L; Fan Z; Han Y; Xu L; Chen D; Wang H
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 51(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 27220291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Percutaneous adjustable closed otoplasty for prominent ear deformity.
    Ozturan O; Dogan R; Eren SB; Aksoy F; Veyseller B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 23524702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Management of Breast Deformity After Removal of Injectable Polyacrylamide Hydrogel: Retrospective Study of 200 Cases for 7 Years.
    Chen B; Song H
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 27251750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Microtia Part II: Post-Operation and Complications Management Lessons from 1012 Ear Reconstruction Operations.
    Chen X; Zhang R; Zhang Q; Xu Z; Xu F; Li D; Li Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 46(6):2790-2796. PubMed ID: 35835875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Asymmetric Z-plasty for telephone deformity in prominent ear correction.
    Uysal A; Uysal CA; Cologlu H; Borman H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1849-51. PubMed ID: 25098579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.