BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35333678)

  • 1. Head excursion in frontal impacts is lower in high back booster seats than in forward facing child seats with internal harnesses designed for children up to 8 years of age.
    Bilston LE; Mills E; Kent N; Brown J; Whyte T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(5):244-249. PubMed ID: 35333678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic frontal crash performance of old and used child restraint systems.
    Whyte T; Kent N; Griffiths M; Bilston LE; Brown J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(7):570-575. PubMed ID: 34432557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
    Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometry of rear seats and child restraints compared to child anthropometry.
    Bilston LE; Sagar N
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2007 Oct; 51():275-98. PubMed ID: 18278601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
    Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frontal Crash Injury Metrics Are Below Mandated Limits for a Spica Casted Child Dummy in Currently Available Restraints.
    Collins AC; Caskey S; Peck JB; Walter N; Atkinson TS; Atkinson PJ
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2020; 40(5):e394-e400. PubMed ID: 31770168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of naturalistic seating postures and seatbelt routing on booster-seated Q6 ATD kinematics and kinetics in frontal impacts.
    Maheshwari J; Griffith M; Baker G; Patton D; Mansfield J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 189():107140. PubMed ID: 37263046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Head impact contact points for restrained child occupants.
    Arbogast KB; Wozniak S; Locey CM; Maltese MR; Zonfrillo MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 22458796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pediatric occupant human body model kinematic and kinetic response variation to changes in seating posture in simulated frontal impacts - with and without automatic emergency braking.
    Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Falciani C; Belwadi A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S49-S53. PubMed ID: 33095067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor Vehicle Crashes, Medical Outcomes, and Hospital Charges Among Children Aged 1-12 Years - Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System, 11 States, 2005-2008.
    Sauber-Schatz EK; Thomas AM; Cook LJ;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Oct; 64(8):1-32. PubMed ID: 26426527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Booster Seat Use on Pediatric Injuries in Motor Vehicle Frontal Crashes.
    Caskey S; Hammond J; Peck J; Sardelli M; Atkinson T
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2018 Aug; 38(7):e382-e386. PubMed ID: 29683858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes.
    Durbin DR; Elliott MR; Winston FK
    JAMA; 2003 Jun; 289(21):2835-40. PubMed ID: 12783914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Belt fit for children in vehicle seats with and without belt-positioning boosters.
    West BA; Reed MP; Benedick A; De Leonardis D; Huey R; Sauber-Schatz E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(8):488-493. PubMed ID: 36026460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses of the Q6/Q6s ATD Positioned in Booster Seats in the Far-Side Seat Location of Side Impact Passenger Car and Sled Tests.
    Tylko S; Bohman K; Bussières A
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2015 Nov; 59():313-35. PubMed ID: 26660749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of reclined seatback angles on the motion of booster-seated children during lateral-oblique low-acceleration impacts.
    Graci V; Burns Iii J; Griffith M; Seacrist T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107117. PubMed ID: 37216696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of booster seat laws on injury risk among children in crashes.
    Eichelberger AH; Chouinard AO; Jermakian JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 23137094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
    Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of booster seats compared with no restraint or seat belt alone for crash injury prevention.
    Ma X; Griffin R; McGwin G; Allison DB; Heymsfield SB; He W; Zhu S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Sep; 20(9):880-7. PubMed ID: 24050794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.