These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35334288)

  • 1. Likelihood ratio estimation for authorship text evidence: An empirical comparison of score- and feature-based methods.
    Ishihara S; Carne M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111268. PubMed ID: 35334288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Score-based likelihood ratios for linguistic text evidence with a bag-of-words model.
    Ishihara S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110980. PubMed ID: 34481115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strength of linguistic text evidence: A fused forensic text comparison system.
    Ishihara S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():184-197. PubMed ID: 28735218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weight of authorship evidence with multiple categories of stylometric features: A multinomial-based discrete model.
    Ishihara S
    Sci Justice; 2023 Mar; 63(2):181-199. PubMed ID: 36870699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An overview of log likelihood ratio cost in forensic science - Where is it used and what values can we expect?
    van Lierop S; Ramos D; Sjerps M; Ypma R
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2024; 8():100466. PubMed ID: 38645839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calibration of score based likelihood ratio estimation in automated forensic facial image comparison.
    Rodriguez AM; Geradts Z; Worring M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111239. PubMed ID: 35364422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved likelihood ratios for face recognition in surveillance video by multimodal feature pairing.
    Macarulla Rodriguez A; Geradts Z; Worring M; Unzueta L
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2024; 8():100458. PubMed ID: 38487302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Zero-inflated Poisson model based likelihood ratio test for drug safety signal detection.
    Huang L; Zheng D; Zalkikar J; Tiwari R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):471-488. PubMed ID: 25189699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs.
    Morrison GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2387-97. PubMed ID: 19354412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing modified zeros for Poisson regression models.
    Tang Y; Tang W
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3123-3141. PubMed ID: 30198417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV.
    Vergeer P; van Schaik Y; Sjerps M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110722. PubMed ID: 33684845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Forensic Data Using Logistic Regression-Based Classification Methods and an R Shiny Implementation.
    Biosa G; Giurghita D; Alladio E; Vincenti M; Neocleous T
    Front Chem; 2020; 8():738. PubMed ID: 33195014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gaussian Mixture Models of Between-Source Variation for Likelihood Ratio Computation from Multivariate Data.
    Franco-Pedroso J; Ramos D; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149958. PubMed ID: 26901680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
    Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios.
    Petersen MR; Deddens JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 18307814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Score-based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence.
    Hepler AB; Saunders CP; Davis LJ; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):129-40. PubMed ID: 22297142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of distance-based approaches for forensic comparison: Application to hand odor evidence.
    Rivals I; Sautier C; Cognon G; Cuzuel V
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2208-2217. PubMed ID: 34342895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios.
    Davis LJ; Saunders CP; Hepler A; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22018850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calibrating Parameters for Microsimulation Disease Models: A Review and Comparison of Different Goodness-of-Fit Criteria.
    van der Steen A; van Rosmalen J; Kroep S; van Hees F; Steyerberg EW; de Koning HJ; van Ballegooijen M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Jul; 36(5):652-65. PubMed ID: 26957567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning Stylometric Representations for Authorship Analysis.
    Ding SHH; Fung BCM; Iqbal F; Cheung WK
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2019 Jan; 49(1):107-121. PubMed ID: 29990260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.