These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study. Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 23108803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth. Banerjee A; Al-Dabbach Z; Bredaki FE; Casagrandi D; Tetteh A; Greenwold N; Ivan M; Jurkovic D; David AL; Napolitano R Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 60(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 35809243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study. Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 22323065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Caesarean Section Scar and Placental Location at the First Trimester of Pregnancy-A Prospective Longitudinal Study. Savukyne E; Kliucinskas M; Malakauskiene L; Berskiene K Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Apr; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section]. Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Change of the residual myometrial thickness during pregnancy in women who underwent laparoscopic niche resection compared with controls without niche surgery: a prospective comparative cohort study. Jordans IPM; Vissers J; de Leeuw RA; Hehenkamp WJK; Twisk JWR; de Groot CJM; Huirne JAF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 227(6):901.e1-901.e12. PubMed ID: 35841936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lower uterine segment scar assessment at 11-14 weeks' gestation to screen for placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior Cesarean delivery. Bhatia A; Palacio M; Wright AM; Yeo GSH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 34254386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section. Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted "on the scar" versus "in the niche". Kaelin Agten A; Cali G; Monteagudo A; Oviedo J; Ramos J; Timor-Tritsch I Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):510.e1-510.e6. PubMed ID: 28115056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study. Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus. Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. Budny-Wińska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34738347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography. Naji O; Wynants L; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23371440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The association between gynecological complaints and the uterine sonographic features in women with a history of cesarean section. Kellner H; Horky A; Louwen F; Bahlmann F; Al Naimi A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 310(1):485-491. PubMed ID: 38695973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy. Chueh HY; Pai AH; Su YY; Hsu CC; Chang FY; Yen CF Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):643-645. PubMed ID: 35219475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study. Barzilay E; Shay A; Lahav-Ezra H; Shina A; Perlman S; Achiron R; Gilboa Y J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(14):1885-1888. PubMed ID: 28511577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]