These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35334583)

  • 21. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of Cesarean section.
    Kamel R; Eissa T; Sharaf M; Negm S; Thilaganathan B
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):466-470. PubMed ID: 32330331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Definition of large niche after Cesarean section based on prediction of postmenstrual spotting: Chinese cohort study in non-pregnant women.
    Wang J; Pang Q; Wei W; Cheng L; Huang F; Cao Y; Hu M; Yan S; He Y; Wei Z
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 59(4):450-456. PubMed ID: 34806258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of cervical changes on the cesarean scar area and niche formation after preterm and term cesarean sections.
    Dogru S; Akkus F; Altınordu Atcı A; Memnune Erdoğan K; Acar A
    J Ultrasound; 2023 Sep; 26(3):717-724. PubMed ID: 36972013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sonographic prediction of scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean section.
    Sharma C; Surya M; Soni A; Soni PK; Verma A; Verma S
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2015 Apr; 65(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 25883440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of the onset of labor on the characteristics of the cesarean scar.
    Al Naimi A; Jennewein L; Mouzakiti N; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 May; 157(2):322-326. PubMed ID: 34077556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3 T MRI.
    Hoffmann J; Exner M; Bremicker K; Grothoff M; Stumpp P; Stepan H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 31068180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
    Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Eißmann C; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 303(3):847-851. PubMed ID: 33415438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.
    Al Naimi A; Wolnicki B; Mouzakiti N; Reinbach T; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 304(6):1485-1491. PubMed ID: 33891206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
    Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
    Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Value of first-trimester ultrasound in prediction of third-trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome.
    Calí G; Timor-Tritsch IE; Forlani F; Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Monteagudo A; Kaelin Agten A; Flacco ME; Khalil A; Buca D; Manzoli L; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):450-459. PubMed ID: 31788885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.
    Zhou X; Zhang T; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Wang X
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33985487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23288683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11-14 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 50(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 27419374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ultrasound Assessment of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness During Pregnancy, Labour, and the Postpartum Period.
    Fukuda M; Fukuda K; Shimizu T; Bujold E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 27032737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
    Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Prediction and analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum].
    Wang LL; Yang HX; Chen JY; Fan LX; Zhang XX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 57(8):587-593. PubMed ID: 36008285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.