These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3533460)

  • 21. Effect of suture material and construction on frictional properties of sutures.
    Gupta BS; Wolf KW; Postlethwait RW
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Jul; 161(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 4012537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tensile strengths of twelve types of knot employed in surgery, using different suture materials.
    Tera H; Aberg C
    Acta Chir Scand; 1976; 142(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1266536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new technique for small and secure knots using slippery polyethylene sutures.
    Nishimura K; Mori R; Miyamoto W; Uchio Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):403-6. PubMed ID: 19261363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
    Wüst DM; Meyer DC; Favre P; Gerber C
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of number of throws on knot security with nonidentical sliding knots.
    Ivy JJ; Unger JB; Hurt J; Mukherjee D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1618-20. PubMed ID: 15547532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A review of suture materials, Part II.
    Meyer RD; Antonini CJ
    Compendium; 1989 Jun; 10(6):360-2, 364, 366-8. PubMed ID: 2691090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of in vitro performance tests and evaluation of nonabsorbable monofilament sutures for cardiovascular surgery.
    Hong T; King MW; Michielsen S; Cheung LW; Mary C; Guzman R; Guidoin R
    ASAIO J; 1998; 44(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 9831085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers.
    Rashid RM; Sartori M; White LE; Villa MT; Yoo SS; Alam M
    Arch Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 143(7):869-72. PubMed ID: 17638730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimum number of throws needed for knot security.
    Muffly TM; Kow N; Iqbal I; Barber MD
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 21338970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cyclic testing of arthroscopic knot security.
    Ilahi OA; Younas SA; Alexander J; Noble PC
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14716281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tying a loop-to-strand suture: is it safe?
    Hurt J; Unger JB; Ivy JJ; Mukherjee D; Pizzaro A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1094-7. PubMed ID: 15846186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Square not a running knot.
    Aanning HL; Haas T; Jorgensen DR; Wulf CA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Mar; 204(3):422-5. PubMed ID: 17324776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of carbon dioxide laser in improving knot security in polyester sutures.
    Gupta BS; Milam BL; Patty RR
    J Appl Biomater; 1990; 1(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 10148991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Experiments on new synthetic and non-absorbable surgical threads].
    Juszkiewicz M
    Polim Med; 1998; 28(1-2):33-58. PubMed ID: 9513257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A simple assessment of surgical sutures and knots.
    Shaw AD; Duthie GS
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1995 Dec; 40(6):388-91. PubMed ID: 8583443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relative importance of Vicryl and Prolene sutures to the strength of healing abdominal wounds.
    Nilsson T
    Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(7):503-7. PubMed ID: 6213133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationship of the diameter and tensile strength of nylon sutures to the USP specification and the effect of preconditioning.
    Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ; Kusy RP
    J Appl Biomater; 1990; 1(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 10148999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs.
    Steen S; Andersson L; Löwenhielm P; Stridbeck H; Walther B; Holmin T
    Surgery; 1984 Feb; 95(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 6420918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Strength of damaged suture: an in vitro study.
    Wright PB; Budoff JE; Yeh ML; Kelm ZS; Luo ZP
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1270-1275.e3. PubMed ID: 17157724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures.
    Viinikainen A; Göransson H; Huovinen K; Kellomäki M; Rokkanen P
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 15542212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.