These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35337895)

  • 1. The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms.
    Fu X; Ye C; Hu Z; Li Z; Liang T; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108320. PubMed ID: 35337895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.
    Li Z; Tong M; Chen S; Qian J
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 33415712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retroactive Attentional Shifts Predict Performance in a Working Memory Task: Evidence by Lateralized EEG Patterns.
    Göddertz A; Klatt LI; Mertes C; Schneider D
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():428. PubMed ID: 30405380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):715-738. PubMed ID: 35297019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective attention enhances visual working memory in the young but not the old: an ERP study.
    Duarte A; Hearons P; Jiang Y; Delvin MC; Newsome RN; Verhaeghen P
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):465-76. PubMed ID: 23445536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial attention based on 2D location and relative depth order modulates visual working memory in a 3D environment.
    Fang W; Wang K; Zhang K; Qian J
    Br J Psychol; 2023 Feb; 114(1):112-131. PubMed ID: 36161427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.
    Gözenman F; Tanoue RT; Metoyer T; Berryhill ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1748-54. PubMed ID: 25045904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention.
    Rerko L; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):712-28. PubMed ID: 24442551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the contribution of motor planning to the retroactive cuing benefit in working memory: Evidence by mu and beta oscillatory activity in the EEG.
    Schneider D; Barth A; Wascher E
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 162():73-85. PubMed ID: 28847491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection within working memory based on a color retro-cue modulates alpha oscillations.
    Poch C; Capilla A; Hinojosa JA; Campo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():133-137. PubMed ID: 28958909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of sequential attention shifts within visual working memory.
    Li Q; Saiki J
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():965. PubMed ID: 25237306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down modulation of alpha power and pattern similarity for threatening representations in visual short-term memory.
    Kuo BC; Li CH; Lin SH; Hu SH; Yeh YY
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():21-30. PubMed ID: 28887064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.