These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35338754)

  • 1. Impact of Temporal Resolution and Methods for Correction on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Quantification.
    Milidonis X; Nazir MS; Chiribiri A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Dec; 56(6):1707-1719. PubMed ID: 35338754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the arterial input sampling location on the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress myocardial perfusion quantification.
    Milidonis X; Franks R; Schneider T; Sánchez-González J; Sammut EC; Plein S; Chiribiri A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Mar; 23(1):35. PubMed ID: 33775247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of spatiotemporal fidelity in quantitative 3D first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Wissmann L; Gotschy A; Santelli C; Tezcan KC; Hamada S; Manka R; Kozerke S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 28125995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects.
    Brown LAE; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Johnson K; Fent GJ; Foley JRJ; Garg P; Chew PG; Knott K; Dall'Armellina E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Kellman P; Plein S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: effect of variations in methodology and validation with positron emission tomography.
    Miller CA; Naish JH; Ainslie MP; Tonge C; Tout D; Arumugam P; Banerji A; Egdell RM; Clark D; Weale P; Steadman CD; McCann GP; Ray SG; Parker GJ; Schmitt M
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 24460930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance of absolute myocardial blood flow with a high-field system: comparison with conventional field strength.
    Christian TF; Bell SP; Whitesell L; Jerosch-Herold M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(9):1103-10. PubMed ID: 19761990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the Choice of Native T
    Kräuter C; Reiter U; Reiter C; Nizhnikava V; Schmidt A; Stollberger R; Fuchsjäger M; Reiter G
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Mar; 53(3):755-765. PubMed ID: 33034120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance derived myocardial perfusion measurements using advanced techniques: microsphere validation in an explanted pig heart system.
    Schuster A; Zarinabad N; Ishida M; Sinclair M; van den Wijngaard JP; Morton G; Hautvast GL; Bigalke B; van Horssen P; Smith N; Spaan JA; Siebes M; Chiribiri A; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Oct; 16(1):82. PubMed ID: 25315438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microvascular Dysfunction in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study.
    Gulati A; Ismail TF; Ali A; Hsu LY; Gonçalves C; Ismail NA; Krishnathasan K; Davendralingam N; Ferreira P; Halliday BP; Jones DA; Wage R; Newsome S; Gatehouse P; Firmin D; Jabbour A; Assomull RG; Mathur A; Pennell DJ; Arai AE; Prasad SK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 2):1699-1708. PubMed ID: 30660522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of balanced SSFP myocardial perfusion imaging at 1.5 T: Impact of the reference image.
    McElroy S; Kunze KP; Milidonis X; Huang L; Nazir MS; Evans C; Bosio F; Mughal N; Masci PG; Neji R; Razavi R; Chiribiri A; Roujol S
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Feb; 87(2):702-717. PubMed ID: 34554603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
    Hsu LY; Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Ta AD; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Chen MY; Shanbhag SM; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 29454767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of acquisition and quantification methods in myocardial blood flow estimability for myocardial perfusion imaging CT.
    Eck BL; Muzic RF; Levi J; Wu H; Fahmi R; Li Y; Fares A; Vembar M; Dhanantwari A; Bezerra HG; Wilson DL
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185011. PubMed ID: 30113311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resting myocardial blood flow is impaired in hibernating myocardium: a magnetic resonance study of quantitative perfusion assessment.
    Selvanayagam JB; Jerosch-Herold M; Porto I; Sheridan D; Cheng AS; Petersen SE; Searle N; Channon KM; Banning AP; Neubauer S
    Circulation; 2005 Nov; 112(21):3289-96. PubMed ID: 16286587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hyperemic stress myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in mice at 3 Tesla: initial experience and validation against microspheres.
    Jogiya R; Makowski M; Phinikaridou A; Patel AS; Jansen C; Zarinabad N; Chiribiri A; Botnar R; Nagel E; Kozerke S; Plein S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jul; 15(1):62. PubMed ID: 23870734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease: A perfusion mapping study.
    Knott KD; Camaioni C; Ramasamy A; Augusto JA; Bhuva AN; Xue H; Manisty C; Hughes RK; Brown LAE; Amersey R; Bourantas C; Kellman P; Plein S; Moon JC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):756-762. PubMed ID: 30684288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiac MR imaging to measure myocardial blood flow response to the cold pressor test in healthy smokers and nonsmokers.
    Fairbairn TA; Motwani M; Mather AN; Biglands JD; Larghat AM; Radjenovic A; Greenwood JP; Plein S
    Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 24072774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in systole and diastole.
    Motwani M; Kidambi A; Sourbron S; Fairbairn TA; Uddin A; Kozerke S; Greenwood JP; Plein S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Feb; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 24565078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal saturation recovery time for minimizing the underestimation of arterial input function in quantitative cardiac perfusion MRI.
    Fan L; Hong K; Hsu LY; Carr JC; Allen BD; Lee DC; Kim D
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Aug; 88(2):832-839. PubMed ID: 35377476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
    Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Prognostic Significance of Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach Using Perfusion Mapping.
    Knott KD; Seraphim A; Augusto JB; Xue H; Chacko L; Aung N; Petersen SE; Cooper JA; Manisty C; Bhuva AN; Kotecha T; Bourantas CV; Davies RH; Brown LAE; Plein S; Fontana M; Kellman P; Moon JC
    Circulation; 2020 Apr; 141(16):1282-1291. PubMed ID: 32078380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.