135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35338894)
1. Development and validation of a novel method "SpermX™" for high throughput differential extraction processing of sexual assault kits (SAKs) for DNA analysis.
Sinha SK; Brown H; Holt H; Khan MR; Brown R; Sgueglia JB; Loftus A; Murphy G; Montgomery A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102690. PubMed ID: 35338894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developmental validation of an efficient differential separation method incorporating the i-sep
White TJ; Rye MS; Tay JW
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1679-1689. PubMed ID: 35373351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.
Wong H; Mihalovich J
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30044890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Horsman KM; Barker SL; Ferrance JP; Forrest KA; Koen KA; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2005 Feb; 77(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 15679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraction of DNA from Sperm Cells in Mixed Stain by Nylon Membrane Bushing Separation Technique.
Ma J; Tong Q; Gao LB; Zhu C; Jiang ZQ
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 34(4):417-419. PubMed ID: 30465410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic trapping of sperm cells from mock sexual assault samples.
Clark CP; Xu K; Scott O; Hickey J; Tsuei AC; Jackson K; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():42-49. PubMed ID: 30954892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative direct-to-amplification cell lysis techniques for forensically relevant non-sperm cells.
Arya R; Hudson BC; Green TD
J Forensic Sci; 2023 Nov; 68(6):2116-2127. PubMed ID: 37779342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advantages of filtration method for sperm-DNA genotyping in sexual assault cases.
Nakagawa T; Doi M; Nishi K; Sugahara T
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2022 Feb; 54():101988. PubMed ID: 34915337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Capillary zone electrophoresis separation and collection of spermatozoa for the forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Wright SN; Huge BJ; Dovichi NJ
Electrophoresis; 2020 Aug; 41(15):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 32453860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel Y-STR typing strategies reveal the genetic profile of the semen donor in extended interval post-coital cervicovaginal samples.
Hall A; Ballantyne J
Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Sep; 136(1-3):58-72. PubMed ID: 12969621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the efficacy of the standard DNA differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():170-177. PubMed ID: 29494880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A portable sperm cell purification instrument based on continuous flow acoustophoretic separation of sperm cells for on-site forensic sample pretreatment.
Sun K; Wang H; Wang L; Lu Y; Liu R; Liu P; Cheng J
Lab Chip; 2021 Mar; 21(5):933-941. PubMed ID: 33439185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
