These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35338894)

  • 61. Optimization of spermatozoa detection using immunofluorescent staining and laser micro-dissection.
    Ping YS; Chan XL; Goh SK; Syn CK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():72-9. PubMed ID: 26338669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Differential DNA extraction of challenging simulated sexual-assault samples: a Swiss collaborative study.
    Vuichard S; Borer U; Bottinelli M; Cossu C; Malik N; Meier V; Gehrig C; Sulzer A; Morerod ML; Castella V
    Investig Genet; 2011 May; 2():11. PubMed ID: 21542912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Advancing forensic RNA typing: On non-target secretions, a nasal mucosa marker, a differential co-extraction protocol and the sensitivity of DNA and RNA profiling.
    van den Berge M; Bhoelai B; Harteveld J; Matai A; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():119-129. PubMed ID: 26590860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Applicability of Nanotrap Sg as a semen detection kit before male-specific DNA profiling in sexual assaults.
    Sato I; Barni F; Yoshiike M; Rapone C; Berti A; Nakaki S; Yamazaki K; Ishikawa F; Iwamoto T
    Int J Legal Med; 2007 Jul; 121(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 16583248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Automatic detection of spermatozoa for laser capture microdissection.
    Vandewoestyne M; Van Hoofstat D; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Deforce D
    Int J Legal Med; 2009 Mar; 123(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18661142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Developmental validation of the SPERM HY-LITER™ kit for the identification of human spermatozoa in forensic samples.
    Miller KW; Old J; Fischer BR; Schweers B; Stipinaite S; Reich K
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):853-65. PubMed ID: 21595688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Comparing Standard and Selective Degradation DNA Extraction Methods: Results from a Field Experiment with Sexual Assault Kits.
    Campbell R; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Shaw J; Feeney H; Nye J; Schelling K; Fehler-Cabral G
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):213-222. PubMed ID: 27885653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A physical method for separating spermatozoa from epithelial cells in sexual assault evidence.
    Chen J; Kobilinsky L; Wolosin D; Shaler R; Baum H
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 9456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Time since intercourse (TSI) data from a large-scale casework study of penile-vaginal penetration allegations using Sperm Elution​™.
    Owers R; Davidson G; McDonald A; Morgan R; O'Rourke P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():10-13. PubMed ID: 29705584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. SWGDAM developmental validation of a 19-locus Y-STR system for forensic casework.
    Daniels DL; Hall AM; Ballantyne J
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):668-83. PubMed ID: 15317180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Advanced forensic validation for human spermatozoa identification using SPERM HY-LITER™ Express with quantitative image analysis.
    Takamura A; Watanabe K; Akutsu T
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jul; 131(4):933-939. PubMed ID: 28102433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Forensic Spermatozoa Detection.
    Suttipasit P
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2019 Dec; 40(4):304-311. PubMed ID: 31687979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Microchip-based cell lysis and DNA extraction from sperm cells for application to forensic analysis.
    Bienvenue JM; Duncalf N; Marchiarullo D; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16566759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The effects of differential extraction conditions on the premature lysis of spermatozoa.
    Hennekens CM; Cooper ES; Cotton RW; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):744-52. PubMed ID: 23550664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Development of a one-tube extraction and amplification method for DNA analysis of sperm and epithelial cells recovered from forensic samples by laser microdissection.
    Meredith M; Bright JA; Cockerton S; Vintiner S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 21411390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Improved cryopreservation of spermatozoa using vitrification: comparison of cryoprotectants and a novel device for long-term storage.
    O'Neill HC; Nikoloska M; Ho H; Doshi A; Maalouf W
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Aug; 36(8):1713-1720. PubMed ID: 31273587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Technical note: Comparison of forensic swabs for intravaginal sampling.
    Egger S; Vöhringer C; Währer J; Schulz I
    Sci Justice; 2022 Jul; 62(4):418-423. PubMed ID: 35931447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The problem of untested sexual assault kits: why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory?
    Patterson D; Campbell R
    J Interpers Violence; 2012 Jul; 27(11):2259-75. PubMed ID: 22258072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Immunohistochemical staining of human sperm cells in smears from sexual assault cases.
    Christoffersen S
    Int J Legal Med; 2011 Nov; 125(6):887-90. PubMed ID: 21887534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.