These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35339321)
1. Impact of orthodontic brackets on intraoral and extraoral scans. Amaral Vargas EO; Otero Amaral Vargas D; da Silva Coqueiro R; Franzotti Sant'anna E; Melo Pithon M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Aug; 162(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 35339321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans. Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast. Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy on Scanned Images of Full Arch Models with Orthodontic Brackets by Various Intraoral Scanners in the Presence of Artificial Saliva. Song J; Kim M Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2920804. PubMed ID: 32185200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison. Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of intraoral scan images in full arch with orthodontic brackets: a retrospective in vivo study. Kim YK; Kim SH; Choi TH; Yen EH; Zou B; Shin Y; Lee NK Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4861-4869. PubMed ID: 33475827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the presence of orthodontic brackets on intraoral scans. Kang SJ; Kee YJ; Lee KC Angle Orthod; 2021 Jan; 91(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 33289796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis. Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study. Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues. Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of four different digital intraoral scanners: effects of the presence of orthodontic brackets and wire. Jung YR; Park JM; Chun YS; Lee KN; Kim M Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 27644178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices. Kernen F; Schlager S; Seidel Alvarez V; Mehrhof J; Vach K; Kohal R; Nelson K; Flügge T J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 33902891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems]. Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning. Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions. Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study. Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study. Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro. Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]