These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35339321)
21. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner. Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of accuracy of mesiodistal tooth measurements made in conventional study models and digital models obtained from intraoral scan and desktop scan of study models. Murugesan A; Sivakumar A J Orthod; 2020 Jun; 47(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 32195636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. Kuhr F; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():68-74. PubMed ID: 27717754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model]. Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study. Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial. Liczmanski K; Stamm T; Sauerland C; Blanck-Lubarsch M Head Face Med; 2020 May; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 32430023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sources of error in maximum intercuspation from complete dentate full-arch intraoral scans in vitro. Osnes C; Wu J; Ferrari M; Joda T; Keeling A Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Sep; 24(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 34553893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Conformity, reliability and validity of digital dental models created by clinical intraoral scanning and extraoral plaster model digitization workflows. Kirschneck C; Kamuf B; Putsch C; Chhatwani S; Bizhang M; Danesh G Comput Biol Med; 2018 Sep; 100():114-122. PubMed ID: 29990644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence. Diker B; Tak Ö Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Digital versus conventional full-arch impressions in linear and 3D accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies. Kong L; Li Y; Liu Z Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5625-5642. PubMed ID: 35786783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback. Sfondrini MF; Gandini P; Malfatto M; Di Corato F; Trovati F; Scribante A Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4103232. PubMed ID: 29850512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The transfer accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions influenced by fixed orthodontic appliances: a reference aid-based in vitro study. Schlenz MA; Klaus K; Schmidt A; Wöstmann B; Mersmann M; Ruf S; Bock NC Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):273-283. PubMed ID: 36109373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An Sason GK; Mistry G; Tabassum R; Shetty O J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 29692563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. Ender A; Mehl A Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 21657122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners. Bohner LOL; De Luca Canto G; Marció BS; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Tortamano Neto P J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):617-623. PubMed ID: 28385434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]