These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35339321)
41. [Effect of digital intraoral full-arch scan strategies on scan time and accuracy on conditions of intraoral head-simulator]. Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Chen DP; Su YC; Wang X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 56(11):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 34763404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning. Tomita Y; Uechi J; Konno M; Sasamoto S; Iijima M; Mizoguchi I Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):628-633. PubMed ID: 29669951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions. Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Effects of pressure steam sterilization times on the accuracy of the digital intraoral scanning data]. Xi Q; Chen X; Zhan X; Zhu J; Wu GF Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):474-478. PubMed ID: 33904283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of Accuracy Between a Conventional and Two Digital Intraoral Impression Techniques. Malik J; Rodriguez J; Weisbloom M; Petridis H Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29518805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Trueness of full-arch IO scans estimated based on 3D translational and rotational deviations of single teeth-an in vitro study. Radeke J; Vogel AB; Schmidt F; Kilic F; Repky S; Beyersmann J; Lapatki BG Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):3273-3286. PubMed ID: 34837565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Passos L; Meiga S; Brigagão V; Street A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):307-319. PubMed ID: 31840139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Trueness of full-arch dental models obtained by digital and conventional impression techniques: an in vivo study. Onbasi Y; Abu-Hossin S; Paulig M; Berger L; Wichmann M; Matta RE Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22509. PubMed ID: 36581668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. Ender A; Mehl A J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A comparison of patient experience, chair-side time, accuracy of dental arch measurements and costs of acquisition of dental models. Glisic O; Hoejbjerre L; Sonnesen L Angle Orthod; 2019 Nov; 89(6):868-875. PubMed ID: 31259615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch. Medina-Sotomayor P; Pascual-Moscardo A; Camps A I J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 30598308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of full-arch digitalization for partially edentulous jaws - a laboratory study on basis of coordinate-based data analysis. Kontis P; Güth JF; Keul C Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Apr; 26(4):3651-3662. PubMed ID: 34981252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Time and Accuracy of the CEREC Omnicam Using Two Different Software Programs. Porr DA; Brooks DI; Liacouras PC; Petrich A; Ellert DO; Ye L J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):130-135. PubMed ID: 33851748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. Lim JH; Park JM; Kim M; Heo SJ; Myung JY J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 28689906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans. Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts. Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]