154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35339347)
1. Single-position robot-assisted versus laparoscopic antegrade bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A retrospective controlled study.
Ji A; Lyu J; Bai Y; Jiang J; Liu F
Asian J Surg; 2022 Aug; 45(8):1530-1534. PubMed ID: 35339347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study.
Yu H; Lu Y; Xiao Y; Guo J; Yin X; Yang Y; Wang H; Gao J
BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31870347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Along with Robotic Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Feasibility Study.
Ahlawat R; Khera R; Gautam G; Kumar A
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):845-849. PubMed ID: 27243665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.
Matin SF; Cormier JN; Ward JF; Pisters LL; Wood CG; Dinney CP; Royal RE; Huang X; Pettaway CA
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1068-74. PubMed ID: 23551693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
Yang M; Liu Z; Tan Q; Hu X; Liu Y; Wei L; Deng C; Zhou S; Yang N; Duan G; Zheng Y; Li X; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Zheng J
BMC Surg; 2023 Mar; 23(1):55. PubMed ID: 36915083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical appraisal of laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein through subcutaneous approach via umbilical cord for the treatment of penile carcinoma: Report of 27 cases].
Wang LX; Zhang C; Yue DZ; Ge JP; Xu S; Dong J
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2023 Aug; 29(8):721-724. PubMed ID: 38619519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis.
Singh A; Jaipuria J; Goel A; Shah S; Bhardwaj R; Baidya S; Jain J; Jain C; Rawal S
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 29307685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term follow-up of comparative study of open and endoscopic lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.
Zhou XL
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jan; 38(1):179-185. PubMed ID: 37950029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy using simultaneous double laparoscopies for penile cancer: A retrospective study.
Ma S; Zhang K; Li R; Lu J; Wu T; Liu Z; Fu X; Tang Q; Ma J
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e1-112.e9. PubMed ID: 35090820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined Partial Penectomy With Bilateral Robotic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Using Near-infrared Fluorescence Guidance.
Sávio LF; Panizzutti Barboza M; Alameddine M; Ahdoot M; Alonzo D; Ritch CR
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():251. PubMed ID: 29191642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer, development of a technique without robot repositioning: a case report.
Sotelo R; Cabrera M; Carmona O; de Andrade R; Martin O; Fernandez G
Ecancermedicalscience; 2013; 7():356. PubMed ID: 24101945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Study of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Through a Hypogastric vs Leg Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer.
Yuan P; Zhao C; Liu Z; Ou Z; He W; Cai Y; Wang Y; Zu X; Qi L; Wang L
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 29256632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preservation of the saphenous vein during laparoendoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique.
Yuan JB; Chen MF; Qi L; Li Y; Li YL; Chen C; Chen JB; Zu XB; Liu LF
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24947014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.
Nabavizadeh R; Petrinec B; Nabavizadeh B; Singh A; Rawal S; Master V
Urol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 32855056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
