184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35342029)
1. Assessing the Environmental Carbon Footprint of Spinal versus General Anesthesia in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions.
Wang AY; Ahsan T; Kosarchuk JJ; Liu P; Riesenburger RI; Kryzanski J
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jul; 163():e199-e206. PubMed ID: 35342029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dataset for carbon footprints of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions performed under spinal or general anesthesia.
Wang AY; Ahsan T; Kosarchuk JJ; Liu P; Riesenburger RI; Kryzanski J
Data Brief; 2022 Jun; 42():108218. PubMed ID: 35539026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spinal versus general anesthesia for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications on operating room time, pain, and ambulation.
De Biase G; Gruenbaum SE; West JL; Chen S; Bojaxhi E; Kryzanski J; Quiñones-Hinojosa A; Abode-Iyamah K
Neurosurg Focus; 2021 Dec; 51(6):E3. PubMed ID: 34852316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Periprocedural Polypharmacy in Lumbar Fusions Performed Under Spinal Anesthesia Compared With General Anesthesia.
Olmos M; Hernandez NS; Kanter M; Liu P; Riesenburger RI; Kryzanski J
Neurosurgery; 2023 Mar; 92(3):632-638. PubMed ID: 36700694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-level awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a Mayo Clinic institutional experience and national analysis.
Abode-Iyamah K; Ghaith AK; Bhandarkar AR; De Biase G; Rajjoub R; Chen SG; Quiñones-Hinojosa A; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2021 Dec; 51(6):E4. PubMed ID: 34852317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of effectiveness between percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
Liu J; Kong Q; Feng P; Zhang B; Ma J; Hu Y; Wu X; Shu X; Pu C
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):681-690. PubMed ID: 35712924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety.
Selznick LA; Shamji MF; Isaacs RE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 19412024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel technique for awake, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note.
Kai-Hong Chan A; Choy W; Miller CA; Robinson LC; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E16. PubMed ID: 30933917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
Orthop Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(1):328-337. PubMed ID: 33426744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].
Kong F; Zhou Q; Qiao Y; Wang W; Zhang C; Pan Q; Zhu H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 36(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 35570634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One surgeon's learning curve A STROBE-compliant article.
Xu YF; Le XF; Tian W; Liu B; Li Q; Zhang GL; Liu YJ; Yuan Q; He D; Mao JP; Xiao B; Lang Z; Han XG; Jin PH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(27):e11423. PubMed ID: 29979443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort.
Wong AP; Smith ZA; Stadler JA; Hu XY; Yan JZ; Li XF; Lee JH; Khoo LT
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2014 Apr; 25(2):279-304. PubMed ID: 24703447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Awake minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a pedicle-based retraction system.
De Biase G; Bechtle P; Leone B; Quinones-Hinojosa A; Abode-Iyamah K
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Jan; 200():106313. PubMed ID: 33139086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
