135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35343088)
21. Usefulness of roadside urine drug screening in drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID).
Raes E; Verstraete AG
J Anal Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 29(7):632-6. PubMed ID: 16419392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Drugged Driving in Wisconsin: Oral Fluid Versus Blood.
Edwards LD; Smith KL; Savage T
J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):523-529. PubMed ID: 28830121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability of roadside oral fluid testing devices for ∆
Scherer JN; Vasconcelos M; Dalanhol CS; Govoni B; Dos Santos BP; Borges GR; de Gouveia GC; Viola PP; Carlson RLR; Martins AF; Costa JL; Huestis MA; Pechansky F
Drug Test Anal; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38440942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Supported liquid extraction (SLE) for the analysis of methylamphetamine, methylenedioxymethylamphetamine and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid and blood of drivers.
Rositano J; Harpas P; Kostakis C; Scott T
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Aug; 265():125-30. PubMed ID: 26878366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. New psychoactive substances in oral fluid of French and Belgian drivers in 2016.
Richeval C; Wille SMR; Nachon-Phanithavong M; Samyn N; Allorge D; Gaulier JM
Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Jul; 57():1-3. PubMed ID: 29631107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationship between oral fluid and blood concentrations of drugs of abuse in drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs.
Wille SM; Raes E; Lillsunde P; Gunnar T; Laloup M; Samyn N; Christophersen AS; Moeller MR; Hammer KP; Verstraete AG
Ther Drug Monit; 2009 Aug; 31(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 19571773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The incidence of psychoactive substances and alcohol among impaired drivers in Denmark in 2015-2019.
Simonsen KW; Hasselstrøm JB; Hermansen SK; Rasmussen BS; Andreasen MF; Christoffersen DJ; Linnet K
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111207. PubMed ID: 35144220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Drugs in oral fluid in randomly selected drivers.
Drummer OH; Gerostamoulos D; Chu M; Swann P; Boorman M; Cairns I
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):105-10. PubMed ID: 17658711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of cannabis use in drivers with the drugwipe device and by GC-MS after Intercept device collection.
Kintz P; Bernhard W; Villain M; Gasser M; Aebi B; Cirimele V
J Anal Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 29(7):724-7. PubMed ID: 16419408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of Dräger DrugTest 5000 in a Naturalistic Setting.
Gjerde H; Clausen GB; Andreassen E; Furuhaugen H
J Anal Toxicol; 2018 May; 42(4):248-254. PubMed ID: 29409046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The detection of THC, CBD and CBN in the oral fluid of Sativex® patients using two on-site screening tests and LC-MS/MS.
Molnar A; Fu S; Lewis J; Allsop DJ; Copeland J
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():113-9. PubMed ID: 24699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Driving under the influence of cannabis: pitfalls, validation, and quality control of a UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid collected with StatSure, Quantisal, or Certus collector.
Wille SM; Di Fazio V; Ramírez-Fernandez Mdel M; Kummer N; Samyn N
Ther Drug Monit; 2013 Feb; 35(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 23318281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Practical aspects of roadside tests for administrative traffic offences in Germany.
Steinmeyer S; Ohr H; Maurer HJ; Moeller MR
Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Sep; 121(1-2):33-6. PubMed ID: 11516885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Screening for drugs in oral fluid: illicit drug use and drug driving in a sample of Queensland motorists.
Davey J; Leal N; Freeman J
Drug Alcohol Rev; 2007 May; 26(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 17454020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Are oral fluid testing devices effective for the roadside detection of recent cannabis use? A systematic review.
Dobri SCD; Moslehi AH; Davies TC
Public Health; 2019 Jun; 171():57-65. PubMed ID: 31102828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. New psychoactive substances in oral fluid of drivers around a music festival in south-west France in 2017.
Richeval C; Dumestre-Toulet V; Wiart JF; Vanhoye X; Humbert L; Nachon-Phanithavong M; Allorge D; Gaulier JM
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():265-269. PubMed ID: 30851602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Screening for drugs of abuse in oral fluid--correlation of analysis results with serum in forensic cases.
Toennes SW; Steinmeyer S; Maurer HJ; Moeller MR; Kauert GF
J Anal Toxicol; 2005; 29(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15808009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On-site testing of illicit drugs: the use of the drug-testing device "Toxiquick".
Biermann T; Schwarze B; Zedler B; Betz P
Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Jun; 143(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 15177627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of oral fluid and sweat wipes for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers.
Samyn N; De Boeck G; Verstraete AG
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Nov; 47(6):1380-7. PubMed ID: 12455668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Illicit Drugs in Oral Fluid: Evaluation of Two Collection Devices.
Cohier C; Mégarbane B; Roussel O
J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 41(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27681339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
