These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35343750)

  • 1. Improving lip aesthetics in the face profile after treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusion.
    Koniarova Z; Husarova R; Stefkova M; Spidlen M; Statelova D; Janickova M; Koniarova A
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2022; 123(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 35343750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.
    Talass MF; Talass L; Baker RC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 3472457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [
    Zhou ZJ; Chen Y; Lin YJ; Sun YT; Wang TG; Mao LX; Liu JQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 34645237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N; Cubrilo D; Hadzi-Mihailović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.
    Bock NC; Santo C; Pancherz H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 19194675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Stamenković Z; Raičković V; Ristić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 25845246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Study of chin morphology in Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion after non-extraction orthodontic treatment].
    Fan FY; Wang XX; Zhang J
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):653-7. PubMed ID: 22241321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile.
    Looi LK; Mills JR
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 3459364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term hard and soft tissue changes after mandibular advancement surgery in Class II patients: a retrospective cephalometric study.
    Storms AS; Miclotte A; Grosjean L; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Alqerban A; Fieuws S; Sun Y; Politis C; Verdonck A; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Oct; 39(5):567-576. PubMed ID: 28204270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental and soft tissue changes following extraction of second premolars in females with bimaxillary protrusion: A retrospective study.
    Alqahtani ND; Alqasir A; Al-Jewair T; Almoammar K; Albarakati SF
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 32788489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Correlation analysis of the nasolabial angle of Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with vertical growth pattern after tooth extraction orthodontic treatment].
    Peng M; Kang J; Zhou J; Du B
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 33(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 26552244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-orthodontic cephalometric variations in bimaxillary protrusion cases managed by premolar extraction - A retrospective study.
    Alqahtani ND; Alshammari R; Almoammar K; Almosa N; Almahdy A; Albarakati SF
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1530-1538. PubMed ID: 31719274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lip profile changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion of varied growth patterns treated with maxillary premolar extractions: A pilot study.
    Mishra D; Natarajan M; Urala AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):684-693. PubMed ID: 33010980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressure from the lips on the teeth and malocclusion.
    Thüer U; Ingervall B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Sep; 90(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 3463198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Klammt's Elastic Open Activator.
    Inamassu-Lemes SM; Fuziy A; Costa AL; Carvalho PE; Nahás-Scocate AC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 27084865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment.
    Tadic N; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 17685775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.