These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35343874)

  • 1. An evaluation of the CARL manikin for use in "patient-free" real ear measurement: consistency and comparison to normative data.
    Folkeard P; Alam M; Koch R; Abbasalipour P; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 35343874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response.
    Westwood GF; Bamford JM
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 7672475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skill Transference of a Probe-Tube Placement Training Simulator.
    Koch RW; Saleh H; Folkeard P; Moodie S; Janeteas C; Agrawal SK; Ladak HM; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 31274072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.
    Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.
    Koning R; Wouters J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 25822646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and intersubject variability of the real ear unaided response.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 1916047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Customized acoustic transform functions and their accuracy at predicting real-ear hearing aid performance.
    Munro KJ; Hatton N
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 10708074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the "coupler to dial difference" and the "real ear to coupler difference".
    Munro KJ; Davis J
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 12677107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal changes in real-ear to coupler difference measurements in infants.
    Bingham K; Jenstad LM; Shahnaz N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Oct; 20(9):558-68. PubMed ID: 19902703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of integrated pressure level real-ear-to-coupler difference measurements.
    Urichuk M; Purcell D; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jun; 63(6):401-410. PubMed ID: 37129231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference: Physical and Perceptual Differences.
    Jorgensen L; Barrett R; Jedlicka D; Messersmith J; Pratt S
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 31(4):1088-1097. PubMed ID: 36037483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimated variability of real-ear insertion response (REIR) due to loudspeaker type and placement.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2004 May; 43(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 15357410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.