These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35344601)

  • 1. The influence of reinforcement schedule on experience-dependent changes in motivation.
    Johnson AR; Christensen BA; Kelly SJ; Calipari ES
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 May; 117(3):320-330. PubMed ID: 35344601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.
    Cohen SL; Riley DS; Weigle PA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Sep; 60(2):255-91. PubMed ID: 8409822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethanol's effects on operant responding: differentiating reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.
    Petry NM
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Apr; 64(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 9661991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation and optimisation of a touchscreen progressive ratio test of motivation in male rats.
    Hailwood JM; Heath CJ; Robbins TW; Saksida LM; Bussey TJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Sep; 235(9):2739-2753. PubMed ID: 30008032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resistance to extinction following variable-interval reinforcement: reinforcer rate and amount.
    Shull RL; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 16602374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimisation of cognitive performance in rodent operant (touchscreen) testing: Evaluation and effects of reinforcer strength.
    Phillips BU; Heath CJ; Ossowska Z; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM
    Learn Behav; 2017 Sep; 45(3):252-262. PubMed ID: 28205186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociation between binge eating behavior and incentive motivation.
    Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Vazquez-Herrera NV; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104273. PubMed ID: 33068639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human free-operant performance varies with a concurrent task: Probability learning without a task, and schedule-consistent with a task.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2020 Jun; 48(2):254-273. PubMed ID: 31898165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcement value of sucrose measured by progressive ratio operant licking in the rat.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2003 Sep; 79(4-5):663-70. PubMed ID: 12954407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of reinforcement schedule on facilitation of operant extinction by chlordiazepoxide.
    Leslie JC; Shaw D; Gregg G; McCormick N; Reynolds DS; Dawson GR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Nov; 84(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 16596968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeated, within-session resurgence.
    Cook JE; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):28-47. PubMed ID: 30656711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The mGlu2/3 agonist LY379268 reduces sucrose taking, seeking, and motivation in male and female rats.
    Grimm JW; Sauter F; MacDougall D; Spaulding E; Stensgaard K; Hardy M; Griffin K; Marx R
    Behav Pharmacol; 2023 Sep; 34(6):340-349. PubMed ID: 37462142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decreased resistance to extinction in ob/ob mice following operant training.
    Reynolds MA; Goodrick CL; Ingram DK
    Physiol Behav; 1982 Oct; 29(4):643-7. PubMed ID: 7178268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Progressive-ratio schedules: effects of later schedule requirements on earlier performances.
    Baron A; Derenne A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 May; 73(3):291-304. PubMed ID: 10866353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resurgence during transitions from variable- to fixed-interval schedules.
    Yensen CP; Nighbor TD; Cook JE; Oliver AC; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2022 Feb; 195():104567. PubMed ID: 34929305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does DRO type matter?: Cycle versus resetting contingencies in eliminating responding.
    Nighbor TD; Cook JE; Oliver AC; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104257. PubMed ID: 33002565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus control of behavioral history.
    Freeman TJ; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 1548448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reinforcement history on responding under progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement.
    Cohen SL; Pedersen J; Kinney GG; Myers J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):375-87. PubMed ID: 8207352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.