366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35344948)
41. Toward a more informative voice range profile: the role of laryngeal vibratory mechanisms on vowels dynamic range.
Lamesch S; Doval B; Castellengo M
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e9-18. PubMed ID: 22652294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices.
Brown WS; Rothman HB; Sapienza CM
J Voice; 2000 Sep; 14(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 11021498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Vocal Tract in Loud Twang-Like Singing While Producing High and Low Pitches.
Saldías M; Laukkanen AM; Guzmán M; Miranda G; Stoney J; Alku P; Sundberg J
J Voice; 2021 Sep; 35(5):807.e1-807.e23. PubMed ID: 32305174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) vs Praat for Assessing Euphonic Subjects: A Preliminary Study on the Gender-discriminating Power of Acoustic Analysis Software.
Lovato A; De Colle W; Giacomelli L; Piacente A; Righetto L; Marioni G; de Filippis C
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e1-765.e5. PubMed ID: 26975896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Feature Maps of the Acoustic Spectrum of the Voice.
Pabon P; Ternström S
J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):161.e1-161.e26. PubMed ID: 30269894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A Comparative Acoustic Analysis of Bangla Folk Song and RabindraSangeet on Long-Term Average Spectrum.
Tarai SK; Chatterjee I; Pani S
J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):304-308. PubMed ID: 34642073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Differences of Electroglottographical Contact Quotients between Connected Speech and Sustained Phonation in Clinical Measurement of Voice.
Echternach M; Nusseck M; Strasding M; Richter B
J Voice; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36941166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of Fundamental Frequency, Vocal Intensity, Sample Duration, and Vowel Context in Cepstral and Spectral Measures of Dysphonic Voices.
Sampaio M; Vaz Masson ML; de Paula Soares MF; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1326-1339. PubMed ID: 32348195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Voice onset time and vowel formant measures in online testing and laboratory-based testing with(out) surgical face masks.
Stoehr A; Souganidis C; Thomas TB; Jacobsen J; Martin CD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jul; 154(1):152-166. PubMed ID: 37436271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Mean fundamental frequency in connected speech and sustained vowel with and without a sentence-frame.
Iwarsson J; Hollen Nielsen R; Næs J
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):91-96. PubMed ID: 31407616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparing Contemporary Commercial and Classical Styles: Emotion Expression in Singing.
Hakanpää T; Waaramaa T; Laukkanen AM
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):570-580. PubMed ID: 31708368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Acoustic and phonatory characterization of the Fado voice.
Mendes AP; Rodrigues AF; Guerreiro DM
J Voice; 2013 Sep; 27(5):655.e9-655.e15. PubMed ID: 23591453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of soft palate implants on acoustic characteristics of voice and articulation.
Akpinar ME; Kocak I; Gurpinar B; Esen HE
J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 20434875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Acoustic markers of vowels produced with different types of face masks.
Georgiou GP
Appl Acoust; 2022 Mar; 191():108691. PubMed ID: 35250034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of Face Masks on Voice Quality Associated with Young and Older Chinese Adult Speakers.
Jiang F; Ng ML; Song Y; Chen Y
J Voice; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38834373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The singer's voice range profile: female professional opera soloists.
Lamarche A; Ternström S; Pabon P
J Voice; 2010 Jul; 24(4):410-26. PubMed ID: 19837561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impact of Face Masks on Speech Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Healthcare Professionals.
McKenna VS; Kendall CL; Patel TH; Howell RJ; Gustin RL
Laryngoscope; 2022 Feb; 132(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 34287933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of Speech Characteristics on Electroglottographic and Instrumental Acoustic Voice Analysis Metrics in Women With Structural Dysphonia Before and After Treatment.
Iob NA; He L; Ternström S; Cai H; Brockmann-Bauser M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1660-1681. PubMed ID: 38758676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The Impact of Protective Face Coverings on Acoustic Markers in Voice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Barsties V Latoszek B; Jansen V; Watts CR; Hetjens S
J Clin Med; 2023 Sep; 12(18):. PubMed ID: 37762863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Differences and Reliability of Linear and Nonlinear Acoustic Measures as a Function of Vocal Intensity in Individuals With Voice Disorders.
de Oliveira Florencio V; Almeida AA; Balata P; Nascimento S; Brockmann-Bauser M; Lopes LW
J Voice; 2023 Sep; 37(5):663-681. PubMed ID: 34116889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
