144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35344972)
1. Assessing the Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Dry Eye Disease.
Oydanich M; Kuklinski E; Asbell PA
Cornea; 2022 Aug; 41(8):1023-1028. PubMed ID: 35344972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
Vågenes H; Pranić SM
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria.
Eleiwa TK; Dihan QA; Brown AD; Zaldivar AT; Abdelnaem SE; Sallam AB; Phillips PH; Elnahry AG; Elhusseiny AM
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38815099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
Awal DH; Mills C
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the quality and readability of online content on shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction.
Reddy RV; Golan R; Loloi J; Diaz P; Saltzman RG; Watane A; Ramasamy R
Andrologia; 2022 Dec; 54(11):e14607. PubMed ID: 36240784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What Our Patients and Their Families Are Reading: Quality and Readability of Internet Information About Electroconvulsive Therapy.
Ekinci O
J ECT; 2023 Dec; 39(4):242-247. PubMed ID: 37310071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web.
Yılmaz FH; Tutar MS; Arslan D; Çeri A
Birth Defects Res; 2021 Jul; 113(12):901-910. PubMed ID: 33594835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Online Sites Reliability, Accountability, Readability, Accessibility, and Translation for Intravitreal Injections.
Rayess N; Li AS; Do DV; Rahimy E
Ophthalmol Retina; 2020 Dec; 4(12):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 32497854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability and quality of online information on total ankle arthroplasty.
Hartnett DA; Philips AP; Daniels AH; Blankenhorn BD
Foot (Edinb); 2023 Mar; 54():101985. PubMed ID: 36827889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis.
Yurdakul OV; Kilicoglu MS; Bagcier F
Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Nov; 65(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33166440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
Özduran E; Hanci V
Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
