249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35346103)
1. Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol.
Park SJ; Kong TW; Kim T; Lee M; Choi CH; Shim SH; Yim GW; Lee S; Lee EJ; Lim MC; Chang SJ; Lee SJ; Lee SH; Song T; Lee YY; Kim HS; Nam EJ
BMC Cancer; 2022 Mar; 22(1):331. PubMed ID: 35346103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Solution to prevent tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using the endoscopic stapler for treating early-stage cervical cancer: Surgical technique with video.
Mun J; Park SJ; Yim GW; Chang SJ; Kim H;
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Dec; 50(10):102211. PubMed ID: 34481135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China.
Chao X; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J; Cheng A; Li W
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029055. PubMed ID: 31362966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.
Wu X; Qiu L; Lou W; Wang X; Zhu T; Zhang Y; Hu W; Xue X; Zhu Z; Xiang L; Li J; Fang X; Gao S; Feng H; Diao W; Zhang H; Du M; Bai Y; Hou Y; Yan W; Feng H; Yu H; Zhu S; Du Y; Jiang H
Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):269. PubMed ID: 35395868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal Closure with EndoGIA to Prevent Tumor Spillage in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Boyraz G; Karalok A; Basaran D; Turan T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):602. PubMed ID: 30064005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Australian, single-centre study of surgical management outcomes for early-stage cervical cancer.
Weishaupt J; Saidi S; Carter J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 61(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 33176013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.
Fusegi A; Kanao H; Tsumura S; Murakami A; Abe A; Aoki Y; Nomura H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e5. PubMed ID: 36424702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
Kim Y; Kim SI; Kim H; Lee M; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Lee C; Suh DH
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35970602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
