251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35346103)
21. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Enclosed Colpotomy and without the Use of Uterine Manipulator for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Yuan P; Liu Z; Qi J; Yang X; Hu T; Tan H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 30802608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.
Kanao H; Fusegi A; Omi M; Youssefzadeh AC; Nomura H; Matsuo K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e27. PubMed ID: 36562133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patterns of recurrence in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer: Comparison between minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy.
Corrado G; Anchora LP; Bruni S; Sperduti I; Certelli C; Chiofalo B; Giannini A; D'Oria O; Bizzarri N; Legge F; Cosentino F; Turco LC; Vizza E; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 49(11):107047. PubMed ID: 37862783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter.
Sun S; Cai J; Li R; Wang Y; Zhao J; Huang Y; Xu L; Yang Q; Wang Z
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):623-637. PubMed ID: 35061066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Melamed A; Margul DJ; Chen L; Keating NL; Del Carmen MG; Yang J; Seagle BL; Alexander A; Barber EL; Rice LW; Wright JD; Kocherginsky M; Shahabi S; Rauh-Hain JA
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 30379613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficacy of different surgical approaches on survival outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study in China.
Chao X; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Song X; Li L
BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e038020. PubMed ID: 32819996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Observational BGOG Study of the Results of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy in 166 Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
de Bruyn A; Peeters F; Smulders K; Goffin F; Traen K; Van Trappen P; Vergote I
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1920-1926. PubMed ID: 34000393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Obermair A; Gebski V; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Levenback C; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 18722970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 1 trial.
Wu X; Feng H; Gao S; Feng H; Diao W; Zhang H; Du M; Lou W; Wang X; Zhu T; Zhang Y; Hu W; Xue X; Zhu Z; Xiang L; Li J; Fang X; Bai Y; Hou Y; Yan W; Qiu L; Yu H; Zhu S; Du Y; Jiang H
BMC Cancer; 2022 Apr; 22(1):384. PubMed ID: 35397576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.
Kim SI; Choi BR; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34969535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
