173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35346512)
1. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Mohamud A; Høgdall C; Schnack T
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 35346512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cancer with ≤5 mm depth of invasion and >7 mm horizontal spread - Is lymph node assessment only required in patients with LVSI?
Wenzel HHB; Van Kol KGG; Nijman HW; Lemmens VEPP; Van der Aa MA; Ebisch RMF; Bekkers RLM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):282-286. PubMed ID: 32381363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prognostic value of the presence of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients; the influence of the new FIGO classification (stage IIIC).
van Kol KGG; Ebisch RMF; van der Aa M; Wenzel HB; Piek JMJ; Bekkers RLM
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 171():9-14. PubMed ID: 36804623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of lymph vascular space invasion on prognosis of patients with early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Yan M; Zhang YN; He JH; Sun JR; Sun XM
Chin J Cancer; 2010 Apr; 29(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 20346220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Satellite lymphovascular space invasion: An independent risk factor in early stage cervical cancer.
Pol FJ; Zusterzeel PL; van Ham MA; Kuijpers DA; Bulten J; Massuger LF
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 26126782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.
Berek JS; Matias-Guiu X; Creutzberg C; Fotopoulou C; Gaffney D; Kehoe S; Lindemann K; Mutch D; Concin N;
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 162(2):383-394. PubMed ID: 37337978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The risk of lymph node metastasis in the new FIGO 2018 stage IA cervical cancer with >7 mm diameter.
Nicolai L; Yigit R; Bleeker MCG; Bart J; van der Velden J; Mom CH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Nov; 34(6):e75. PubMed ID: 37477098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Number of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes and Multiple Groups of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis Influence Prognosis in Stage IA-IIB Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Liu Y; Zhao LJ; Li MZ; Li MX; Wang JL; Wei LH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Aug; 128(15):2084-9. PubMed ID: 26228223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of Lymph Node Metastasis and Risk Factors in 975 Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IA-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Cao L; Kong W; Li J; Song D; Jin B; Liu T; Han C
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 36450266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer.
Buckley SL; Tritz DM; Van Le L; Higgins R; Sevin BU; Ueland FR; DePriest PD; Gallion HH; Bailey CL; Kryscio RJ; Fowler W; Averette H; van Nagell JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 8898159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.
Berek JS; Matias-Guiu X; Creutzberg C; Fotopoulou C; Gaffney D; Kehoe S; Lindemann K; Mutch D; Concin N;
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 34(5):e85. PubMed ID: 37593813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.
Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective study of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes positivity in stage 1A to 2A cervical cancer patients.
John Lim BB; Yong CM
Med J Malaysia; 2021 Jul; 76(4):534-540. PubMed ID: 34305115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor Size at Magnetic Resonance Imaging Association With Lymph Node Metastasis and Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Resectable Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Evaluation of Surgical Specimens.
Chen XL; Chen GW; Xu GH; Ren J; Li ZL; Pu H; Li H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Oct; 28(8):1545-1552. PubMed ID: 30044321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.
Osaku D; Komatsu H; Okawa M; Iida Y; Sato S; Oishi T; Harada T
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1054-1058. PubMed ID: 34794737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The potential for less radical surgery in women with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer.
Bai H; Yuan F; Wang H; Chen J; Cui Q; Shen K
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 130(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 26070225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
