129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35347340)
1. Polyethylene liner motion in dual-mobility hip prostheses: static and dynamic radiostereometry in 16 patients 1 year after operation.
Jørgensen PB; Kaptein BL; Søballe K; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
Acta Orthop; 2022 Mar; 93():375-381. PubMed ID: 35347340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined and hybrid marker models for radiostereometry assessment of polyethylene liner motion in dual mobility hip prosthesis: a proof-of-concept study.
Jørgensen PB; Kaptein BL; Søballe K; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
Eur Radiol Exp; 2021 Dec; 5(1):55. PubMed ID: 34907467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of inclination and anteversion angles on kinematics and contact mechanics of dual mobility hip implants.
Gao Y; Chen Z; Zhang Z; Chen S; Jin Z
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():48-55. PubMed ID: 29933214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of Cup Inclination Angle with Liner Wear for Metal-on-polyethylene in Hip Primary Arthroplasty.
Tian JL; Sun L; Hu RY; Han W; Tian XB
Orthop Surg; 2017 May; 9(2):186-190. PubMed ID: 28557297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic Hip Kinematics During the Golf Swing After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Hara D; Nakashima Y; Hamai S; Higaki H; Ikebe S; Shimoto T; Yoshimoto K; Iwamoto Y
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):1801-9. PubMed ID: 27037283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Highly crosslinked polyethylene wear rates and acetabular component orientation: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Naudie DD; McCalden RW; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):891-897. PubMed ID: 29954202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo kinematics, component alignment and hardware variables influence on the liner-to-neck clearance during chair-rising after total hip arthroplasty.
Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Hara D; Higaki H; Gondo H; Wang Y; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Komiyama K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
J Orthop Sci; 2020 May; 25(3):452-459. PubMed ID: 31178276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liner orientation change of dual mobility cup determined via 3D ultrasound imaging and motion analysis: a cadaver study.
Riglet L; Viste A; Dumas R; Liebgott H; Henri Fessy M; Lise Gras L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Jul; ():103924. PubMed ID: 38964498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Minimum Ten Years of Follow-Up of Alumina Head on Delta Liner Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Choy WS; Cha YH; Jeon CY; Lee KS; Kim HY
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):470-476. PubMed ID: 28958658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Acetabular Shell Position and Component Design on Hip Dynamic Dislocation.
Higuera Rueda CA; Ferguson DF; Scholl L; Klika AK
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):766-771. PubMed ID: 30639282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal position of lipped acetabular liners to improve stability in total hip arthroplasty-an intraoperative in vivo study.
Hau R; Hammeschlag J; Law C; Wang KK
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 13(1):289. PubMed ID: 30453985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spontaneous dissociation of offset, face-changing polyethylene liners from the acetabular shell: a report of four cases.
Gray CF; Moore RE; Lee GC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(9):841-5. PubMed ID: 22552674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer simulation based on in vivo kinematics of a replaced hip during chair-rising for elucidating target cup and stem positioning with a safety range of hip rotation.
Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Hara D; Gondo H; Komiyama K; Yoshimoto K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jan; 91():105537. PubMed ID: 34847472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer simulation of optimal lipped polyethylene liner orientation against prosthetic impingement.
Hu Y; Zhou X; Qiao H; Zhu Z; Li H; Zhang J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):204. PubMed ID: 35379266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement.
Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Migration and Wear of a Dual Mobility Acetabular Construct at 3 Years Measured by Radiostereometric Analysis.
Laende EK; Richardson CG; Dunbar MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1109-1116. PubMed ID: 31866254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elucidation of target implant orientations with the safety range of hip rotation with adduction or abduction during squatting: Simulation based on
Harada S; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Hara D; Higaki H; Gondo H; Kawahara S; Shiomoto K; Harada T; Nakashima Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1023721. PubMed ID: 36466333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of early migration patterns between a ceramic and polyethylene liner in uncemented Trabecular Titanium cups: a 2-year randomized controlled trial of 52 hips using radiostereometric analysis.
Klaassen AD; Schäffer EA; Willigenburg NW; Van Beers LWAH; Scholtes VAB; Van der Hulst VPM; Koster LA; Kaptein BL; Moojen DJF; Poolman RW
Acta Orthop; 2022 Apr; 93():451-458. PubMed ID: 35485295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing Liner Anteversion Decreases the Interfacial Strength of Polyethylene Liners Cemented Into Titanium-Alloy Acetabular Shells.
Kurdziel MD; Ennin KA; Baker KC; Verner JJ
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2922-2925. PubMed ID: 27426030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
