136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35347582)
21. Population-Based Health Engagement Opportunities Through Breast Imaging: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.
Narayan AK; Flores EJ; Harvey HB; Lehman CD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1401-1407. PubMed ID: 30061047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you": breast imagers' perspectives regarding screening mammography for others and for themselves--do they practice what they preach?
Lee J; Gordon PB; Whitman GJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1336-44. PubMed ID: 26001246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Sprague BL; Conant EF; Onega T; Garcia MP; Beaber EF; Herschorn SD; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN; Lacson R; Schnall MD; Kontos D; Haas JS; Weaver DL; Barlow WE;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 165(7):457-464. PubMed ID: 27428568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women aged 40-49 years with a moderate family history of breast cancer: a single-arm cohort study.
Duffy SW; Mackay J; Thomas S; Anderson E; Chen TH; Ellis I; Evans G; Fielder H; Fox R; Gui G; Macmillan D; Moss S; Rogers C; Sibbering M; Wallis M; Warren R; Watson E; Whynes D; Allgood P; Caunt J
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(11):vii-xiv, 1-95. PubMed ID: 23489892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Mammography breast cancer screening in Italy: 2010 survey].
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(6 Suppl 1):8-27. PubMed ID: 23293268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Frankel SD; Ominsky SH; Sickles EA; Ernster V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1801-9. PubMed ID: 9839520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs.
Scott HJ; Gale AG
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17209118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography: Cross-Sectional Survey Results From the National Health Interview Survey.
López DB; Flores EJ; Miles RC; Wang GX; Glover M; Shepard JO; Lehman CD; Narayan AK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1433-1439. PubMed ID: 31092347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
Baum JK; Hanna LG; Acharyya S; Mahoney MC; Conant EF; Bassett LW; Pisano ED
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21502382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.
Sickles EA; Wolverton DE; Dee KE
Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):861-9. PubMed ID: 12202726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mammography screening in Italy: 2005 survey and 2006 preliminary data.
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(2 Suppl 1):7-22. PubMed ID: 18770992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Results of a pilot programme of mammographic breast cancer screening in the Western Cape.
Apffelstaedt JP; Hattingh R; Baatjes K; Wessels N
S Afr Med J; 2014 Apr; 104(4):297-8. PubMed ID: 25118557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.
; ;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(1 Suppl 1):1-225. PubMed ID: 23585445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of bilateral breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in the Netherlands: a population-based study.
Setz-Pels W; Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Hooijen MJ; Louwman MW
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 21474705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?
Andersen SB; Törnberg S; Kilpeläinen S; Von Euler-Chelpin M; Njor SH
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 30(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 25421784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
