148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35348073)
21. Screening for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Usman Ali M; Miller J; Peirson L; Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Kenny M; Sherifali D; Raina P
Prev Med; 2016 Aug; 89():301-314. PubMed ID: 27130532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening among family physicians.
Ersek JL; Eberth JM; McDonnell KK; Strayer SM; Sercy E; Cartmell KB; Friedman DB
Cancer; 2016 Aug; 122(15):2324-31. PubMed ID: 27294476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening.
Le T; Miller S; Berry E; Zamarripa S; Rodriguez A; Barkley B; Kandathil A; Brewington C; Argenbright KE; Gerber DE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 Mar; 19(3):480-487. PubMed ID: 35143786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Real-world Clinical Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening-Evaluating Processes to Improve Screening Guidelines-Concordance.
Carroll NM; Burnett-Hartman AN; Joyce CA; Kinnard W; Harker EJ; Hall V; Steiner JS; Blum-Barnett E; Ritzwoller DP
J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1143-1152. PubMed ID: 31974902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening: comparison of performance between annual and biennial screen.
Sverzellati N; Silva M; Calareso G; Galeone C; Marchianò A; Sestini S; Sozzi G; Pastorino U
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3821-3829. PubMed ID: 26868497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patients' Reactions to Being Offered Financial Incentives to Increase Colorectal Screening: A Qualitative Analysis.
Shay LA; Kimbel KJ; Dorsey CN; Jauregui LC; Vernon SW; Kullgren JT; Green BB
Am J Health Promot; 2021 Mar; 35(3):421-429. PubMed ID: 33504161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient Perspectives on Longitudinal Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening.
Holman A; Kross E; Crothers K; Cole A; Wernli K; Triplette M
Chest; 2022 Jul; 162(1):230-241. PubMed ID: 35149081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center.
Lewis JA; Petty WJ; Tooze JA; Miller DP; Chiles C; Miller AA; Bellinger C; Weaver KE
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Apr; 24(4):664-70. PubMed ID: 25613118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lung Cancer Screening: Computed Tomography Radiation and Protocols.
Murugan VA; Kalra MK; Rehani M; Digumarthy SR
J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Sep; 30(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 25856411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A National Survey of Pulmonologists' Views on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer.
Iaccarino JM; Clark J; Bolton R; Kinsinger L; Kelley M; Slatore CG; Au DH; Wiener RS
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1667-75. PubMed ID: 26368003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Planning and Implementation of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Programs in the United States.
Qiu R; Copeland A; Sercy E; Porter NR; McDonnell KK; Eberth J
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Feb; 20(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 26800406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Real-World Lung Cancer CT Screening Performance, Smoking Behavior, and Adherence to Recommendations: Lung-RADS Category and Smoking Status Predict Adherence.
Barbosa EJM; Yang R; Hershman M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):919-926. PubMed ID: 32755178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Translating New Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines into Practice: The Experience of One Community Hospital.
Ledford CJ; Gawrys BL; Wall JL; Saas PD; Seehusen DA
J Am Board Fam Med; 2016; 29(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 26769888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of Promotional Materials To Promote Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening to High-Risk Consumers and Health Care Providers.
Hudson JN; Quinn GP; Wilson LE; Simmons VN
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Oct; 33(5):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 28285419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patterns and Factors Associated With Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening in Diverse Practice Settings.
Sakoda LC; Rivera MP; Zhang J; Perera P; Laurent CA; Durham D; Huamani Velasquez R; Lane L; Schwartz A; Quesenberry CP; Minowada G; Henderson LM
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e218559. PubMed ID: 33929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening.
O'Brien MA; Sullivan F; Carson A; Siddiqui R; Syed S; Paszat L
BMC Fam Pract; 2017 Nov; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 29179686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus other cancer screenings in early diagnosis of lung cancer: A meta-analysis.
Wang X; Liu H; Shen Y; Li W; Chen Y; Wang H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(27):e11233. PubMed ID: 29979385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Attitudes About Lung Cancer Screening: Primary Care Providers Versus Specialists.
Rajupet S; Doshi D; Wisnivesky JP; Lin JJ
Clin Lung Cancer; 2017 Nov; 18(6):e417-e423. PubMed ID: 28648531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Moving beyond the national lung screening trial: discussing strategies for implementation of lung cancer screening programs.
Goulart BH; Ramsey SD
Oncologist; 2013; 18(8):941-6. PubMed ID: 23873718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Low-Dose CT Scan for Lung Cancer Screening: Clinical and Coding Considerations.
Shieh Y; Bohnenkamp M
Chest; 2017 Jul; 152(1):204-209. PubMed ID: 28336485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]